From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 191C0208AC5 for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 22:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wgbfa7 with SMTP id fa7so3138060wgb.28 for ; Sat, 05 May 2012 22:18:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MOb/m3j/qQsqA/1NKBW+kcg1TCsI4d4o8TEw2MyfIeg=; b=PIQnjv8RgwYV6QSrF5lmXwA7eXHiyY0CIXsImXiwJ5W7WaEHEuFS+Ce/PJeW1DNelQ C37Gc2WJhvz2/VjGsnD7YimzQ/1H2aOs2Q1HaSYPa+5cVSBOoeNk7HDt9gBNs2vwnJ+S mXEum+OqwXeSYD3JUsc9BvwKUZ3dDCzXcF5sFRRsxUEPm2FavOINa+zUHBC8K/LMThDE S8pqICQICi5j//IwFSRsjC1yxwSxZjVP0GrsktPvrtIneUZ+RErkG2kcKlxH//rO2VQr CxiRb7tR5XXyTvnR6JEdGY4AX8YaZbPWkxFP9kbvIgK6+6WshkRMkyv2l7C3uD3rdKtj 6Hsg== Received: by 10.216.199.1 with SMTP id w1mr2629110wen.19.1336281485460; Sat, 05 May 2012 22:18:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.28.130.107] ([74.125.122.49]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k6sm11056217wiy.7.2012.05.05.22.18.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 05 May 2012 22:18:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Eric Dumazet To: dave taht In-Reply-To: <4FA5B584.2050400@gmail.com> References: <1336217671-20384-1-git-send-email-dave.taht@bufferbloat.net> <1336218794.3752.508.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1336229343.3752.516.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1336249251.3752.558.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1336250168.3752.560.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1336252281.3752.561.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FA597C0.7090206@gmail.com> <1336252832.3752.563.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FA5A3B8.7020808@gmail.com> <1336255783.3752.573.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FA5AB05.9030305@gmail.com> <1336257554.3752.578.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FA5AE25.1080506@gmail.com> <1336259238.3752.611.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FA5B584.2050400@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 07:18:01 +0200 Message-ID: <1336281481.3752.994.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, Dave =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=E4ht?= Subject: Re: [Codel] [PATCH v5] pkt_sched: codel: Controlled Delay AQM X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 05:18:09 -0000 On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 16:19 -0700, dave taht wrote: > I don't buy it. See previous mail. > > count - some_x sure. It depends if some_x is a constant or not. TCP cwnd is divided by two after a drop. cwnd = cwnd >> 1; If we did cwnd = cwnd - some_x; It would no work very well. I am now experimenting : q->count = max(1U, q->count - (q->count >> 2)); (count = 75% of count)