From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com (mail-wg0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2129A200B29
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun,  6 May 2012 11:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so2585309wgb.4
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 06 May 2012 11:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date
	:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=10K9aVZUtijUqeY5VsBueMuM61NWSTSdAXhgzLb4HZ0=;
	b=xuQRhiobdyDuo/sp16kwmukXvv61P247zdqy7mFCSdp0XGJSc9EkHmfoquM2IM5nVk
	G/aFhx+6fvpHH7FoHKeH2sWJK5GXf7KtzpXtLLqHu7ZpGFuZy0qi/u1NuxrUcAb622tv
	Od6tkmn+UHrjGu9h83P+spHQKqf96o9FsUfhlJ2s9rKal6VEN9CT92fRgapQmAXh/pQG
	u8X5C2sxgirOEW9Hjnrv1RufShitpbJGk9HJuyGAQt+J9Os7K3s2EM94UkUq6ZxODdeZ
	FoD8lz2rRNOr3ytbH0HKV4QCbq16+wkdiP7XIjDkIBoR9YQnFXbgscjaEhYZWA6FmM2l
	9zmw==
Received: by 10.216.139.67 with SMTP id b45mr4714399wej.0.1336330113900;
	Sun, 06 May 2012 11:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.30.42.18] (122.237.66.86.rev.sfr.net. [86.66.237.122])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h5sm24917542wiy.3.2012.05.06.11.48.32
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 May 2012 11:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net>
In-Reply-To: <4FA6C21A.8060402@superduper.net>
References: <CAA93jw7bnQED7QXc_jgsEyf-ydR0Bo-OazBZOTXDQ9nYYCgpJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1336281092.3752.982.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1336283203.3752.1032.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1336315913.3752.1598.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1336324134.3752.1825.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<4FA6B2FB.2030809@freedesktop.org> <4FA6BBDE.8070909@gmail.com>
	<4FA6C21A.8060402@superduper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 20:48:30 +0200
Message-ID: <1336330110.3752.2094.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] usage of 'count' in codel
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/private/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 18:48:36 -0000

On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 11:25 -0700, Simon Barber wrote:
> I was thinking the same thing (implement sfq+codel), I'm happy to 
> refactor the codel code to be usable both standalone and with sfq, 
> unless Eric is already doing it. Another option would be pfifofast + 
> codel - perhaps a candidate for the default qdisc?

Yep, I am doing this factorization, a bit like we did for RED

But I am not sure its worth before stabilization.

I'll send a v8, with timing changed to use 1024 ns resolution to ease
things and reduce memory foot print.