From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com
	[74.125.82.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8666B200B29
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun,  6 May 2012 11:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wejx9 with SMTP id x9so5151491wej.16
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 06 May 2012 11:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date
	:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=GbHVZm0hXmQmzZ3sHEo74n4FcQv3mEFkQEB0Thya5dg=;
	b=PQ76zGldwSbWraGOvkQNiXvSmqZvn1EHXxnUqeY026Zaj++akfelAlxDSONpit4ctJ
	qXVVbeTi5/wUKKNgI2x7RVwFapoaR3XkgCgnlWFVGIES/YFL1K4UMKkGnaIQLJqppzuJ
	sf3oNyMvGiLk6RPYhtUCV/NMhEO+0fKKCXEOdeScS0REm//vzndkakRW7lQomNDDSJVk
	BP2c9O7bPs2NuAzv9PV5DNK/fNERE85YbLos6nJRydu6JipuaVrYvREgxTOipSlmbDbL
	/FDmWtiBoMElSNlS8AoA2RtQo+fgnlLy8uI55mz+QsWKeGcA8yV+MxUD7KUk4tHNrRsr
	T1Wg==
Received: by 10.216.135.141 with SMTP id u13mr7938452wei.79.1336330160544;
	Sun, 06 May 2012 11:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.30.42.18] (122.237.66.86.rev.sfr.net. [86.66.237.122])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j3sm24936490wiw.1.2012.05.06.11.49.18
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 May 2012 11:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6ZTi6p2jQb=RB0PgGUoTjQgRLr20X2FJiWHHYzQqWNFQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw7bnQED7QXc_jgsEyf-ydR0Bo-OazBZOTXDQ9nYYCgpJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1336281092.3752.982.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1336283203.3752.1032.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1336315913.3752.1598.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1336324134.3752.1825.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<4FA6B2FB.2030809@freedesktop.org>
	<1336328140.3752.2014.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAA93jw6ZTi6p2jQb=RB0PgGUoTjQgRLr20X2FJiWHHYzQqWNFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 20:49:17 +0200
Message-ID: <1336330157.3752.2095.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] usage of 'count' in codel
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/private/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 18:49:23 -0000

On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 11:26 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:

> What do you see at 10GigE with like 60 netperfs?
> 

Same problems, if I limit to say 6Gb.

> (god, can you even drive 10GigE that hard? me is jealous of hardware.

sure, once you tweak tcp stack to avoid some bottlenecks ;)

>  I CAN get to where I can drive GigE now, I just want to update both
>  sides of the connection to be codel capable, and am waiting on a
>  more final patch)

Well, these are Intel 82599 dual ports cards, and they work pretty well.