From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ee0-f43.google.com (mail-ee0-f43.google.com [74.125.83.43])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 416CC201AF7
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon,  7 May 2012 10:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eekc13 with SMTP id c13so2096502eek.16
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 07 May 2012 10:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date
	:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=Eiu9K9NAJRI2PyNZZfyrCxihDt09J/EA5I7G2I17W58=;
	b=Zpvx01hBCHlIAe2pH+rKCyynVEnjQwCPx/NrDreCImgxJvSLPtpLgR6q0Q3XHNjWJU
	Www5OJa/bkz85VAvo4zpZ+syZcqmuripAi/9DOs4HxZA/GgEC75IPAXGvUEvLAjWQ6gS
	qtfqKAmbJfKer/Gstm0+hQxj6wUc5Q7GZrywLNryTk0SZiHvSbKsRSmYA/j+NNUBEpj8
	kjL7v0oajXileZWNmFyEJ1le8mQt1zv5giF0sqfe+y/EqCqHBnil3sKyRoGg9P6doDDc
	dtzxVCGE655cxp2F1rWIgfDqc5ubOvPdJ0EGSM0A5mZ09I/+RaS1omykPFT8t6xBTVL8
	NlqA==
Received: by 10.14.119.74 with SMTP id m50mr284367eeh.83.1336410630333;
	Mon, 07 May 2012 10:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.163.193] ([74.125.121.33])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n52sm82193131eef.6.2012.05.07.10.10.28
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 May 2012 10:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FA7FBC7.2040501@hp.com>
References: <1336246349-20228-1-git-send-email-dave.taht@bufferbloat.net>
	<4FA7FBC7.2040501@hp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 19:10:26 +0200
Message-ID: <1336410626.3752.2329.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, codel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	Dave Taht <dave.taht@bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Codel] [PATCH 1/2] codel: Controlled Delay AQM
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/private/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:10:32 -0000

On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 09:43 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> On 05/05/2012 12:32 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> > From: Dave Täht<dave.taht@bufferbloat.net>
> >
> > tc qdisc ... codel [ limit PACKETS ] [ target TIME]
> > 		   [ interval TIME ] [ minbytes BYTES ]
> 
> Usability suggestions - "target_latency" or "target_lat" and 
> "action_interval" or "decision_interval" perhaps?

We took the terms used in the codel paper.

By the way, target is not target_latency, its more a target threshold
(packets under it are not dropped), but packets above might be dropped.