From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ee0-f43.google.com (mail-ee0-f43.google.com [74.125.83.43])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45E15201A91
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon,  7 May 2012 10:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eekc13 with SMTP id c13so2106916eek.16
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 07 May 2012 10:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date
	:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=4dJaa2XB8F5PiuDaFv0Xm/Bl8q4uIq1tRx731FAxJ8I=;
	b=znfPebp9Sp5G+NdL9b+AnLccXRHODQ4XfphnzhDfW2K9rkgyjy9sO2ZBEnaJt7WdWc
	6fmr30DdAYt9pM+hA3JfqiMfCKruyAJ0n1kpb6r7t5HbvZtWDIIDs5Ie2gUcLgK6v9eE
	BMYzYgt89+jlBsTYYTK/Ng9Ea2K7qCWr7SSwz0/20cBtQgLZ6Yuvb53wAg+ylr9/fEMs
	cso1kE6sjaxAYbnF0QQ/2WtzD9bVJ+BDYHttfsy2rCp/lcdTe9NOrgVdfnOQDdA8TYUx
	4lOeNaddnoduxtbGCFXMd0Df0q5yA8gyJ9jEofn3zXzU/WlKdIgO0yBjhFdjqujCHDhE
	sg/w==
Received: by 10.14.119.77 with SMTP id m53mr1092910eeh.26.1336412083387;
	Mon, 07 May 2012 10:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.163.193] ([74.125.121.33])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y54sm29651251eef.10.2012.05.07.10.34.41
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 May 2012 10:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FA805F9.20004@hp.com>
References: <1336246349-20228-1-git-send-email-dave.taht@bufferbloat.net>
	<4FA7FBC7.2040501@hp.com> <1336410626.3752.2329.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<4FA805F9.20004@hp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 19:34:39 +0200
Message-ID: <1336412079.3752.2333.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, codel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	Dave Taht <dave.taht@bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Codel] [PATCH 1/2] codel: Controlled Delay AQM
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/private/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:34:45 -0000

On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 10:27 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:

> 
> I don't wish to rathole, and someone may want to declare Bikeshed! but 
> the target audience of the paper is a bit different from the Linux 
> system administrator base yes?  If a parameter name enhancement makes 
> something more clear to an administrator is it really a bad thing to 
> have a name that is not a strict duplicate of the paper's?
> 
> rick

I dont know, we have no precedence in linux for 'target' and 'interval'

So picking the codel words seems ok