From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com (mail-bk0-f43.google.com
	[209.85.214.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57AAD20228F;
	Wed,  9 May 2012 09:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkty5 with SMTP id y5so892904bkt.16
	for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 09 May 2012 09:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date
	:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=XUr82I6h0DNtnHMGVrYhTb8IfT8sOJKUkszOEECTyuM=;
	b=t81kIUMgr1DKu78pQfGrgS7L2SegryCVNJaEXtIIfwXryJGXzkcglLnl4gTEPT38Iq
	VPVxyeoyLA3FuE0LmF9+VRl5JCKnA3r1UZ+oGRUxTLgjX4SGnurJg3J8cFiI26cxcFqc
	aQEbZij0Xgp4zrdBs1uVA7uFKUGZN3UaGK/zGIf4u7LqN2m0CHZov6ufEQbEveioMNZ6
	7kfcojyTS1EjD4qxztPszEaD0rOaGQ7vnhx9Q1O92AEB+oHLDVTizbkGuQTtvHWj0gIo
	Cjs1xgJVmsyzcvBjyZCTXRJmawRro2blQyHlXrODSOcqGnXxcyyGfzNZafUT4eQot1A3
	XkIA==
Received: by 10.204.152.210 with SMTP id h18mr236268bkw.119.1336580058397;
	Wed, 09 May 2012 09:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.28.91.135] ([74.125.122.49])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm6327113bku.9.2012.05.09.09.14.13
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 May 2012 09:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5gu2nFwiQ9vmA5_=hnfkoF5B+kJfh+Fpc2m-dp-y5AGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1336368957-17586-1-git-send-email-dave.taht@bufferbloat.net>
	<1336399043.3752.2318.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1336571439.12504.27.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAA93jw4syCKONK1h61v076PdHFwQCr9wvyGHiT4ksC_FDuuKSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1336578874.12504.40.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAA93jw5gu2nFwiQ9vmA5_=hnfkoF5B+kJfh+Fpc2m-dp-y5AGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 18:14:11 +0200
Message-ID: <1336580051.12504.43.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	Dave =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=E4ht?= <dave.taht@bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Codel] [PATCH v12] codel: Controlled Delay AQM
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 16:14:21 -0000

On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 09:08 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:

> In the special case of routers and switches with codel on by default,
> I think it would help. I can code it up....

Can you explain why it would help ?

How less than 0.1 % offset in time measurement can change things ?