CoDel AQM discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: dave.taht@bufferbloat.net, nanditad@google.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, codel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	ycheng@google.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, mattmathis@google.com
Subject: Re: [Codel] [PATCH net-next] codel: use Newton method instead of sqrt() and divides
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 22:40:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1336855256.31653.1329.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120512.155259.1178343836887150194.davem@davemloft.net>

On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 15:52 -0400, David Miller wrote:

> Applied but I never like that bitfield sharing for real integers.
> 
> GCC makes a complete mess of it as it extracts and inserts the
> integer value into that bit field.  You are guarenteed to get
> better code if you do this by hand in a full u32.
> 
> Either that or just bite the bullet and use a completely seperate
> field, maybe we'll need more boolean states later.

I couldnt use a full u32 or else fq_codel cell was > 64 bytes (or I
would have to remove the 'dropped' field)

24 bit of precision for the reciprocal value is more than enough (Van
suggested 16 bits in fact), so we have actually room for 7 bits if
needed.

By the way, gcc on x86 generates nice "and 0xfffffffe,%eax" instruction
for (vars->rec_inv_sqrt << 1).

Thanks



  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-12 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-12 13:32 Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 19:52 ` David Miller
2012-05-12 20:40   ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-05-12 20:45     ` David Miller
2012-05-12 21:48       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 21:52         ` David Miller
2012-05-13  7:23           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14  5:46             ` Andrew McGregor
2012-05-14  6:00               ` dave taht
2012-05-14  6:17                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14  6:33                   ` dave taht
2012-05-14  6:47                     ` dave taht
2012-05-14  6:51                       ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14  8:23                         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14  8:50                           ` dave taht
2012-05-14  9:03                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 11:34                           ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14 11:56                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 15:05                             ` Dave Taht
2012-05-14 18:31                               ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14 22:33             ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1336855256.31653.1329.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=mattmathis@google.com \
    --cc=nanditad@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox