CoDel AQM discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: nanditad@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	mattmathis@google.com, codel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	ncardwell@google.com, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Codel] [RFC PATCH v2] tcp: TCP Small Queues
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:34:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342078459.3265.8244.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342050592.3265.8195.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 01:49 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> The 10Gb receiver is a net-next kernel, but the 1Gb receiver is a 2.6.38
> ubuntu kernel. They probably have very different TCP behavior.


I tested TSQ on bnx2x and 10Gb links.

I get full rate even using 65536 bytes for
the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_limit_output_bytes tunable

OMNI Send TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 10.246.8.37 () port 0 AF_INET : histogram
Local       Remote      Local  Elapsed Throughput Throughput  Local Local  Remote Remote Local   Remote  Service  
Send Socket Recv Socket Send   Time               Units       CPU   CPU    CPU    CPU    Service Service Demand   
Size        Size        Size   (sec)                          Util  Util   Util   Util   Demand  Demand  Units    
Final       Final                                             %     Method %      Method                          
1606536     2097152     16384  20.00   9411.12    10^6bits/s  2.40  S      4.27   S      0.502   0.892   usec/KB  




  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-12  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-28 17:07 [Codel] [PATCH net-next] fq_codel: report congestion notification at enqueue time Eric Dumazet
2012-06-28 17:51 ` Dave Taht
2012-06-28 18:12   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-28 22:56     ` Yuchung Cheng
2012-06-28 23:47       ` Dave Taht
2012-06-29  4:50         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-29  5:24           ` Dave Taht
2012-07-04 10:11           ` [Codel] [RFC PATCH] tcp: limit data skbs in qdisc layer Eric Dumazet
2012-07-09  7:08             ` David Miller
2012-07-09  8:03               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-09  8:48                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-09 14:55               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-10 13:28                 ` Lin Ming
2012-07-10 15:13                 ` [Codel] [RFC PATCH v2] tcp: TCP Small Queues Eric Dumazet
2012-07-10 17:06                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-10 17:37                   ` Yuchung Cheng
2012-07-10 18:32                     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-11 15:11                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-11 15:16                     ` Ben Greear
2012-07-11 15:25                       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-11 15:43                         ` Ben Greear
2012-07-11 15:54                           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-11 16:03                             ` Ben Greear
2012-07-11 18:23                     ` Rick Jones
2012-07-11 23:38                       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-11 18:44                     ` Rick Jones
2012-07-11 23:49                       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-12  7:34                         ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-07-12  7:37                           ` David Miller
2012-07-12  7:51                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-12 14:55                               ` Tom Herbert
2012-07-12 13:33                   ` John Heffner
2012-07-12 13:46                     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-12 16:44                       ` John Heffner
2012-07-12 16:54                         ` Jim Gettys
2012-06-28 23:52 ` [Codel] [PATCH net-next] fq_codel: report congestion notification at enqueue time Nandita Dukkipati
2012-06-29  4:18   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-29  4:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-29  5:12   ` David Miller
2012-06-29  5:24     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-29  5:29       ` David Miller
2012-06-29  5:50         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-29  7:53           ` David Miller
2012-06-29  8:04           ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1342078459.3265.8244.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=mattmathis@google.com \
    --cc=nanditad@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox