From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com (mail-bk0-f43.google.com
	[209.85.214.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ADC121F0B9
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkty15 with SMTP id y15so3029070bkt.16
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date
	:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=NDx7+8X4gKPW+HvM0G3QN4L17DRkoQjsBRBtwD2XMYg=;
	b=TDSSNyc3psuWnT2HxXacnUaUUHWPXh1cbX6FDSuOHzU9hP7Z7Mz36fuRm9t5TYIv9q
	b90gnjrnIhWlALgldwdnCY1U3+Y3/5+/maWNrAbCfuv+G1b+YhsNQFcSSS9itq9/pKMh
	6/7VX5SO3mUxYQxpckjf0gT5Dt3sE2kH7eTst2tH5lZ0DSVv0gkPcXRuCky7cb+SYwTo
	43MiUiKvC2OMKW9B87kHnC/EW7Vc/eqmfqobyFsySA5h7KjGhi6/NurQUUpjLSbPS5nj
	MmbaIl51FsVigrr1jCiTybiKWwIiWB3EMM6sR29d+JQvHqMmMVXNzTTfyiquELVB+9d+
	DRxw==
Received: by 10.205.139.6 with SMTP id iu6mr22612097bkc.20.1342079490150;
	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.28.88.151] ([74.125.122.49])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y20sm2309442bkv.11.2012.07.12.00.51.28
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120712.003700.49235222504944712.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <4FFDC985.6050805@hp.com>
	<1342050592.3265.8195.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1342078459.3265.8244.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<20120712.003700.49235222504944712.davem@davemloft.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:51:27 +0200
Message-ID: <1342079487.3265.8245.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: nanditad@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mattmathis@google.com,
	codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, ncardwell@google.com
Subject: Re: [Codel] [RFC PATCH v2] tcp: TCP Small Queues
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 07:51:32 -0000

On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 00:37 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:34:19 +0200
> 
> > On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 01:49 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > 
> >> The 10Gb receiver is a net-next kernel, but the 1Gb receiver is a 2.6.38
> >> ubuntu kernel. They probably have very different TCP behavior.
> > 
> > 
> > I tested TSQ on bnx2x and 10Gb links.
> > 
> > I get full rate even using 65536 bytes for
> > the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_limit_output_bytes tunable
> 
> Great work Eric.

Thanks !