From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Richard Scheffenegger <rscheff@gmx.at>
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] [RFC PATCH] codel: ecn mark at target
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 19:35:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1344188112.9299.1614.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344187557.9299.1610.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 19:26 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> It could be a flaw in linux implementation, I admit we had so many bugs
> that it could very well be still buggy.
And at first glance, the following tcpdump seems suspect : We can see
all ACK are delayed by about 40 ms
19:30:54.367739 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 64, id 52620, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1500)
172.30.42.19.50341 > 172.30.42.18.50103: Flags [.], seq 156841:158289, ack 1, win 115, options [nop,nop,TS val 3115533 ecr 111212487], length 1448
19:30:54.406063 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 62099, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52)
172.30.42.18.50103 > 172.30.42.19.50341: Flags [.E], cksum 0xac88 (incorrect -> 0xe2b7), ack 158289, win 551, options [nop,nop,TS val 111212491 ecr 3115533], length 0
19:30:54.407212 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 64, id 52621, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1500)
172.30.42.19.50341 > 172.30.42.18.50103: Flags [P.W], seq 158289:159737, ack 1, win 115, options [nop,nop,TS val 3115573 ecr 111212491], length 1448
19:30:54.446057 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 62100, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52)
172.30.42.18.50103 > 172.30.42.19.50341: Flags [.E], cksum 0xac88 (incorrect -> 0xdce3), ack 159737, win 551, options [nop,nop,TS val 111212495 ecr 3115573], length 0
19:30:54.448209 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 64, id 52622, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1500)
172.30.42.19.50341 > 172.30.42.18.50103: Flags [.W], seq 159737:161185, ack 1, win 115, options [nop,nop,TS val 3115613 ecr 111212495], length 1448
19:30:54.486057 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 62101, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52)
172.30.42.18.50103 > 172.30.42.19.50341: Flags [.E], cksum 0xac88 (incorrect -> 0xd70f), ack 161185, win 551, options [nop,nop,TS val 111212499 ecr 3115613], length 0
19:30:54.487443 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 64, id 52623, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1500)
172.30.42.19.50341 > 172.30.42.18.50103: Flags [.W], seq 161185:162633, ack 1, win 115, options [nop,nop,TS val 3115653 ecr 111212499], length 1448
19:30:54.526069 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 62102, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52)
172.30.42.18.50103 > 172.30.42.19.50341: Flags [.E], cksum 0xac88 (incorrect -> 0xd13b), ack 162633, win 551, options [nop,nop,TS val 111212503 ecr 3115653], length 0
19:30:54.527241 IP (tos 0x2,ECT(0), ttl 64, id 52624, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1500)
172.30.42.19.50341 > 172.30.42.18.50103: Flags [.W], seq 162633:164081, ack 1, win 115, options [nop,nop,TS val 3115693 ecr 111212503], length 1448
19:30:54.566049 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 62103, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52)
172.30.42.18.50103 > 172.30.42.19.50341: Flags [.], cksum 0xac88 (incorrect -> 0xcba7), ack 164081, win 551, options [nop,nop,TS val 111212507 ecr 3115693], length 0
19:30:54.567809 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 64, id 52625, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1500)
172.30.42.19.50341 > 172.30.42.18.50103: Flags [.], seq 164081:165529, ack 1, win 115, options [nop,nop,TS val 3115733 ecr 111212507], length 1448
19:30:54.606067 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 62104, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52)
172.30.42.18.50103 > 172.30.42.19.50341: Flags [.E], cksum 0xac88 (incorrect -> 0xc593), ack 165529, win 551, options [nop,nop,TS val 111212511 ecr 3115733], length 0
19:30:54.607088 IP (tos 0x2,ECT(0), ttl 64, id 52626, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1500)
172.30.42.19.50341 > 172.30.42.18.50103: Flags [.W], seq 165529:166977, ack 1, win 115, options [nop,nop,TS val 3115773 ecr 111212511], length 1448
19:30:54.646056 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 62105, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52)
172.30.42.18.50103 > 172.30.42.19.50341: Flags [.], cksum 0xac88 (incorrect -> 0xbfff), ack 166977, win 551, options [nop,nop,TS val 111212515 ecr 3115773], length 0
19:30:54.648105 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 64, id 52627, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1500)
172.30.42.19.50341 > 172.30.42.18.50103: Flags [.], seq 166977:168425, ack 1, win 115, options [nop,nop,TS val 3115813 ecr 111212515], length 1448
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-05 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-04 2:44 Dave Täht
2012-08-04 6:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-04 21:53 ` Kathleen Nichols
2012-08-05 3:06 ` Andrew McGregor
2012-08-05 5:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-05 16:53 ` Andrew McGregor
2012-08-05 16:58 ` Kathleen Nichols
2012-08-05 17:14 ` Andrew McGregor
2012-08-05 17:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-05 16:54 ` Richard Scheffenegger
2012-08-05 17:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-05 17:35 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-08-05 18:14 ` Yuchung Cheng
2012-08-05 18:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-05 19:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-06 16:22 ` Richard Scheffenegger
2012-08-06 16:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-06 17:50 ` Dave Taht
2012-08-06 19:09 ` Andrew McGregor
2012-08-06 20:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-10 17:48 ` Dave Taht
2012-08-04 7:00 ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-08-04 13:38 ` Richard Scheffenegger
2012-08-04 17:21 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1344188112.9299.1614.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=rscheff@gmx.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox