From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com
	[74.125.82.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3348E21F0A2
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun,  2 Sep 2012 16:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by weys43 with SMTP id s43so5239497wey.16
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date
	:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=hCmhv/5BGOHaleyrvEbvpCbFwMz7Fs/nISJGnQppvqg=;
	b=A2nENzDyaVW4yKquDBij842mZ4ACviGPFZirmSlkK40zqrFF3il1AlEIPSnZqhQ8np
	6/SB+gTSByEv58Ygvdb1IWKLvwlO4o59ZGtL9iWP7jKPo+rOCRSHzoYIGHw/CQVygdH9
	4doDFAthH4naOvtG61RJw8PwwF7PCayygIOPJPy/MAPPX7Iv8q6t1M2gpSjeoYBdoL13
	fAoZFtuj1OgM5r0X902s8zm1EQ4g8+wPRUHJk6yt4/zBEEtTk0gzn1lhz/QLT02qCotu
	sqZLRUIhE0q75s6V5raubbW4yKZ9/PJoNOpRHnKrOD1OAqEz6Zc2LA3HOkR0JDTUovHP
	EeDA==
Received: by 10.216.99.199 with SMTP id x49mr9081598wef.171.1346628517225;
	Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.37] (149.237.66.86.rev.sfr.net. [86.66.237.149])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bc2sm23295192wib.0.2012.09.02.16.28.35
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6VTTeZx8iQt1ioMMhsajHL8JXoTtL97fxmS1X=hzcaFQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1346396137.2586.301.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<5040DDE9.7030507@hp.com> <1346430207.7996.11.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAA93jw6hQhFpJjySqfRTS3DFLDKV+LPfLzqDU8JMZdJOBaJ2HQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1346504012.7996.68.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAA93jw4gAUXYHOSHC6A15nEgdm9Fh2tze5PehK1M-qyksYAqGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw6VTTeZx8iQt1ioMMhsajHL8JXoTtL97fxmS1X=hzcaFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 01:28:35 +0200
Message-ID: <1346628515.2563.74.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] fq_codel : interval servo
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 23:28:39 -0000

On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 11:17 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> In reviewing this mail I realized I used three different names
> for tcp_limit_output_bytes, corrected below...
> 

This TSQ limit is a per flow limit, and a workaround for people still
using pfifo_fast, so that a single TCP elephant flow doesnt hurt too
much.

Our expectation is to replace pfifo_fast using a fq_codel like qdisc

In linux Plumber Conference, the last part of my pres was to say that I
was working on this.

Dont waste your time on TSQ, use the real thing.