From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com (mail-bk0-f43.google.com
	[209.85.214.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D459B200994
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue,  4 Sep 2012 09:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkty15 with SMTP id y15so4119921bkt.16
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 09:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date
	:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=5ypo8LsFPk7ymKn+3zMyO/JswdrM8aUZjEVBTeymSzY=;
	b=ZFoSUMytQSZfbIQ0tZgfA+2QCCU2UnTuXQz2JY1nCiVvUzWLa13ZfZsyDHgEqDsvbR
	JdSY4y6cHPG2sn0zf0XhUP9SwvOLkHUhutlVlVffZOjgAGFLmMjIHFz8ybcIoPDyI+Ge
	tFJmbZsZcq9BbKQI+IDJAfvt86Die7MuLc2a0mO4Aq+NjACcmXd5JARn0iQnHrfh4C1i
	40I+Jm9hu/mpmQQdboD+kRVGAXvIapzbeYY5Uafv1qhFHRm1bRMi3+jps0WQvbM78OVG
	FWDW0m5/x1j59easVK40QvZHwwlLBheX2z8LMXA0s7+7t3oEJ7OhV0i1kYnqXzFNc/vE
	Yo/Q==
Received: by 10.204.152.19 with SMTP id e19mr8420586bkw.8.1346777854735;
	Tue, 04 Sep 2012 09:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.142.158] ([74.125.121.33])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hg13sm10984275bkc.7.2012.09.04.09.57.31
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 04 Sep 2012 09:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6k4pgwanTa81oHb8jV6WGMfoo6KuOBSjbrfU3eRMbt5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1346396137.2586.301.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1346421031.2591.34.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1346421466.2591.38.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAK6E8=cwpq0MVK6fcrOa=wTX237xQiVP2xzh0aX-AtuSmzt-sw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1346503884.7996.65.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAB_+Fg5xPRqEZNdH0mYogmm4LitMvycSLB-X1_7ryn4RY9FvSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1346772855.13121.40.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAA93jw6k4pgwanTa81oHb8jV6WGMfoo6KuOBSjbrfU3eRMbt5A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:57:29 +0200
Message-ID: <1346777849.13121.50.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Tomas Hruby <thruby@google.com>, Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] [RFC v2] fq_codel : interval servo on hosts
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:57:37 -0000

On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 09:40 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:

> fq_codel has a standing queue problem, based on the fact that when a
> queue empties, codel.h resets. This made sense for the single FIFO
> codel but not multi-queued fq_codel. So after we hit X high rate
> flows, target can never be achieved, even straining mightily, and we
> end up with a standing queue again.
> 
> Easily seen with like 150 bidirectional flows at 10 or 100Mbit.
> 
> (as queues go, it's still pretty good queue. And: I've fiddled with
> various means of draining multi-queue behavior thus far, and they
> ended up unstable/unfair)

No idea of what you mean by "codel.h resets".

Please use small mails, one idea by mail.