From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (mail-pa0-f53.google.com
	[209.85.220.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1D6A21F1D4;
	Tue,  7 May 2013 13:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id kq12so769959pab.26
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 07 May 2013 13:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=x-received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to
	:references:content-type:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; bh=J0bUTcTg2ZU+Ud3BelVJOnCPVNzhUd/EAPnQlIp9EXw=;
	b=xsjEFnxbCQ73QMRDOFzQ5QhV8b/0uupB99LuWy6h2eaNUm0f4mUN0Ug7UDNrK/8Hmn
	CD6LAkxQcNXb+O/6lT7nOm9VmmSmg5pO3I3XoC5CB1lVgWFrw0CQ3l4xMx/TxAQxPJGN
	QtQv7HUceDDYfKrvvieV7C/yUJhViX8Pt3OgdxFLdWWy8Nt09U1LyDhJZAHM2GA4rPpu
	NFRYk39Ceon7PzjvPvKCuQ0NWeQITi4Z/LsGk19KLL1eYmMHRmvpppr1Bx78M0ybIZqG
	jWJ7Gyzs3FU4UzTarzGkK/9ntArR50TFbfxdZrBVyJRK+6CiONDpGlo1uhtv0CZYQ75c
	aSlA==
X-Received: by 10.66.12.129 with SMTP id y1mr4556131pab.182.1367958624221;
	Tue, 07 May 2013 13:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620:0:1000:3304:6df9:2c99:8b77:70ad?
	([2620:0:1000:3304:6df9:2c99:8b77:70ad])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
	qi1sm31619979pac.21.2013.05.07.13.30.23 for <multiple recipients>
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Tue, 07 May 2013 13:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1367958622.13473.10.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Wes Felter <wmf@felter.org>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 13:30:22 -0700
In-Reply-To: <kmbm8e$1a7$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <19404.1367933465@sandelman.ca>
	<CDAE8660.11924%g.white@cablelabs.com> <kmbm8e$1a7$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] [Bloat] Latest codel, fq_codel,
 and pie sim study from cablelabs now available
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 20:30:25 -0000

On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 14:56 -0500, Wes Felter wrote:

> Is it time for prio_fq_codel or wfq_codel? That's what comes to mind 
> when seeing the BitTorrent vs. VoIP results.

Sure !

eth=eth0
tc qdisc del dev $eth root 2>/dev/null
tc -batch << EOF
qdisc add dev $eth root handle 1: prio bands 3 
qdisc add dev $eth parent 1:1 handle 11: fq_codel
qdisc add dev $eth parent 1:2 handle 12: fq_codel
qdisc add dev $eth parent 1:3 handle 13: fq_codel
EOF