From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Codel] hardware multiqueue in fq_codel?
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:19:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1373649589.10804.34.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7tgL8CGz6KzwiJrtWKHJhkzk_WXXB9JGN7xg35A=1nzQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:54 -0400, Dave Taht wrote:
> My point was that same program would be just as damaging against
> pfifo_fast.
>
> > Or just think of SYN flood attack.
>
> For which other defenses exist.
If someone uses pfifo_fast, it needs no particular protection right now
to be able to log in into his machine.
Thats the point you absolutely missed. Its kind of incredible.
If fq_codel could replace pfifo_fast as is, why do you think I did not
submit the patch doing the change ????
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-12 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-11 17:09 Dave Taht
2013-07-11 17:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-11 18:06 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-11 18:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-11 21:18 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 0:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 0:48 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 9:34 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-12 15:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 16:36 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-07-12 16:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 17:00 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-15 13:40 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-15 13:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-15 14:24 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-15 15:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-15 17:19 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 16:37 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 16:39 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 16:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 16:54 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 17:19 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-07-12 17:35 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 18:06 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-15 12:56 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-12 17:32 ` luca.muscariello
2013-07-11 19:41 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1373649589.10804.34.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=jbrouer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox