CoDel AQM discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Codel] hardware multiqueue in fq_codel?
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:47:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1373651221.10804.37.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6JM-SQsRUCJjQPEy=+iQ02Px2UJmvN9nUH-ZLLeizBHA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 13:35 -0400, Dave Taht wrote:

> Against a syn flood attack?


Yes. SYNACK messages are in the band 1. SYNACK messages might be
dropped, but your precious management traffic will not.


> 
> > Thats the point you absolutely missed. Its kind of incredible.
> 
> I guess I'm still entirely missing it. By default the networks I have
> are protected by the syn_flood mechanism as enabled in openwrt.

Most servers coping with synflood or any kind of traffic flood do not
use openwrt ;)




  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-12 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-11 17:09 Dave Taht
2013-07-11 17:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-11 18:06   ` Dave Taht
2013-07-11 18:54     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-11 21:18       ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12  0:06         ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12  0:48           ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12  9:34         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-12 15:13           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 16:36             ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-07-12 16:54               ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 17:00                 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-15 13:40                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-15 13:57                   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-15 14:24                     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-15 15:30                     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-15 17:19                     ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 16:37             ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 16:39               ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 16:50               ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 16:54                 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 17:19                   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 17:35                     ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 17:47                       ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-07-12 18:06                         ` Dave Taht
2013-07-15 12:56                     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-12 17:32                   ` luca.muscariello
2013-07-11 19:41     ` Jonathan Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1373651221.10804.37.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbrouer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox