From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pb0-x22d.google.com (mail-pb0-x22d.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F86D21F1C1
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id mc8so9248252pbc.32
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references
	:content-type:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
	bh=tIXm9GuNK/X5GPRL3i7IXXz9MVzXjB1vx5rKCqJM6j0=;
	b=pRM4+MAaVbypNSnHBRMUP+e2KJm+ZyM7xHSZC/T4TmnxqW2kDmM3s0uVeWNs2zkn/m
	9pOoFq9RA13VxJUGmUccauhhvdEk2Z4VLN0/c3OWImFvfAVZKeCewY/NtKg0zeclGJj4
	uuAviKA8nTxRpN5Z7XCHEq6jYwwovDZRxsamHvF0vKwDHmf2UigN5woOQdEHIP+la1L5
	xp5lkI7Cp9IXDtJ8rFox1uPlZMGTXqti6IRw/G/FdITm99o5dxuqRgBVX4xjCUB7XkkN
	XfY0/CaY4qYWe3q/GYE2VpfRwa63S+2Bk1wRnct+CD7ciH65Sa8AqEqLQbH7Jw0H5zDG
	Cn+w==
X-Received: by 10.68.247.226 with SMTP id yh2mr42348356pbc.164.1373651222634; 
	Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620:0:1000:3304:2f:cc3b:ee84:65d9?
	([2620:0:1000:3304:2f:cc3b:ee84:65d9])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
	xl3sm46482523pbb.17.2013.07.12.10.47.01 for <multiple recipients>
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1373651221.10804.37.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:47:01 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6JM-SQsRUCJjQPEy=+iQ02Px2UJmvN9nUH-ZLLeizBHA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw5SBtsz3=L9M7mhASg9oAVyvysFL9VNwc-52mOk4HWg8A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1373564673.4600.55.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAA93jw6rd1G2Q4pmfAB5GPuwfqCbVPDw6njCaceszD9q5Avz_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1373568848.4600.66.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAA93jw4+TcWOBH8mMpsk6EAO-EVzemHvx1FjPbrevEzqTJmr_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130712113413.4b601800@redhat.com>
	<1373642001.10804.18.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAA93jw56qvkNwNEwSVUsGGvTJ8FG3Sd9hOmnP6cWnfiYFFa3Wg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1373647842.10804.28.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAA93jw7tgL8CGz6KzwiJrtWKHJhkzk_WXXB9JGN7xg35A=1nzQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1373649589.10804.34.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAA93jw6JM-SQsRUCJjQPEy=+iQ02Px2UJmvN9nUH-ZLLeizBHA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Codel] hardware multiqueue in fq_codel?
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:47:03 -0000

On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 13:35 -0400, Dave Taht wrote:

> Against a syn flood attack?


Yes. SYNACK messages are in the band 1. SYNACK messages might be
dropped, but your precious management traffic will not.


> 
> > Thats the point you absolutely missed. Its kind of incredible.
> 
> I guess I'm still entirely missing it. By default the networks I have
> are protected by the syn_flood mechanism as enabled in openwrt.

Most servers coping with synflood or any kind of traffic flood do not
use openwrt ;)