From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-x231.google.com (mail-pb0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2027C21F199 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:31:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id jt11so11278830pbb.8 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:31:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :content-type:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=3HRERKhrut+/6YUB7tAEMFNtuCCXue6ZtH5ktGqbMpg=; b=WVkS1DmCK4QkHGt9PpZbpf3oCcGDI8sE1PawcNybuskhWPCfLz9Tc0m70e3603UPPq k8jfqGdsVUUZEN8uF1mr7bQtd0CEsv98W1H2BuCMg3cM4/6eMMSoVMrZX8vvqVS7puYJ 0Iq2AqdScJcEXDxeNJZhJYKRedS73BoB8tv/PZM3WKo1eTtTJ8JmScgIDH/LSwI007wl sO8losygWDshaK8QQfH+m0AYIJsz2AeYWI8H2GO4NYqDKt+IV0Z6qk2+18CwWIpt4bCT qFOmUAJ9cDbmwmBsF6lE3bDpNfOyw99ZGaxcOhFI+R9pMvtTNjonaqZVyKt//9KQEAPw QpIQ== X-Received: by 10.66.232.42 with SMTP id tl10mr54841405pac.159.1373902261667; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:31:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.19.242.21] ([172.19.242.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vu5sm65156404pab.10.2013.07.15.08.31.00 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:31:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1373902259.10804.74.camel@edumazet-glaptop> From: Eric Dumazet To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:30:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1373896674.10804.73.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1373564673.4600.55.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1373568848.4600.66.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130712113413.4b601800@redhat.com> <1373642001.10804.18.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1373648057.10804.29.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130715154009.4c0d4531@redhat.com> <1373896674.10804.73.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Codel] hardware multiqueue in fq_codel? X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:31:02 -0000 On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 06:57 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > By the way, tcp_cong.c has a race in its list handling, list_move() is > not RCU compatable. Oh well, list_move() is fine, ignore this false statement.