From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cero2@snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net>
Received: from snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:203::c001])
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89737201B34
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net (Postfix, from userid 1005)
	id 7EA622208CD; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@bufferbloat.net>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:19:55 -0700
Message-Id: <1382404797-17239-1-git-send-email-dave.taht@bufferbloat.net>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5
Subject: [Codel] [PATCH 0/2] net-next codel enhancements
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 01:20:04 -0000

These two patches have been extensively tested in openwrt
and cerowrt. Losing the fq_codel drop statistic as a bug.

Checking for a maxpacket size in the qdisc was somewhat 
correct for ns2 but not for Linux as all the current 
subsystems below htb/hfsc/adsl/bql buffer packets.

IMHO both of these patches are candidates for stable.