CoDel AQM discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian@interlinx.bc.ca>
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] what am i doing wrong?  why isn't codel working?
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:11:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403626306.3796.19.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403616175.3478.731.camel@pc.interlinx.bc.ca>

On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 09:22 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've upgraded my router to OpenWRT Breaker Barrier r41163 which has
> kernel 3.10.36 in it.  I was pleased to see that codel appears (to my
> very newbie eyes) to be default on what should be the
> "fast->slow" (where bufferbloat happens) interfaces:
> 
> qdisc fq_codel 0: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 limit 1024p flows 1024 quantum 300 target 5.0ms interval 100.0ms ecn 
> qdisc mq 0: dev wlan1 root 
> qdisc mq 0: dev wlan0 root 
> qdisc fq_codel 0: dev pppoe-wan1 root refcnt 2 limit 1024p flows 1024 quantum 300 target 5.0ms interval 100.0ms ecn 
> qdisc fq_codel 0: dev tun0 root refcnt 2 limit 1024p flows 1024 quantum 300 target 5.0ms interval 100.0ms ecn 
> 
> So first thing to notice is that this router has two WAN interfaces but
> only one of them (pppoe-wan1) has had codel applied.  The other WAN
> interface (eth0.2) is not even listed.
> 
> So off I go to experiment with the WAN interface that does have codel
> applied...
> 
> So I do the saturate-and-ping test through pppoe-wan1 and ping times go
> from ~12ms to ~1200ms, while saturating the upstream so clearly codel is
> not working there.
> 
> What am I doing wrong?


Maybe queue builds after the qdisc.

ethtool eth0
ethtool -g eth0




  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-24 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-24 13:22 Brian J. Murrell
2014-06-24 16:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-06-24 16:11 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2014-06-24 16:26 ` Dave Taht
2014-06-24 17:29   ` Brian J. Murrell
2014-06-24 18:20     ` Dave Taht
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-06-24 12:37 Brian J. Murrell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1403626306.3796.19.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=brian@interlinx.bc.ca \
    --cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox