From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com (mail-pd0-x234.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20A5121F3D2
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pdea3 with SMTP id a3so78384037pde.3
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references
	:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=QSS5ZmPReHxvp92CcjUEem1l1k+h8/4HqU9+l082yQg=;
	b=C+JoLQWH4Xjm6euKiy9wVhlf4LRyrEwligkESFypay8by2FS8xvroyf3BKx0JS9elu
	KGF2KrlJGCutml5lSo8C8xBrvNLWxzHe4GgYYRG0cu+6PDAxYSSGHGfcpTtZ34cAcsOb
	BtcutKo1jd+naLNurHaN7zMLkoPEcVQFsECFF/vxrxEDU2gtgJfz9mXzhzmAbGnVzsyA
	msDkkaGX9Ov4yZu57Fg72A46Tk1chxf0K508LglVoOK80SvMWm7ckwRS6hhyB4YA3czp
	2/FuLeyx9IZfBEZw8aZWUzcSsgoZTP3z0PbOj8is9pbrxbL5eKjVLO8NWE7orucOryFK
	eUPw==
X-Received: by 10.68.87.35 with SMTP id u3mr52897884pbz.127.1429160764196;
	Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.86.116] (50-197-141-106-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net.
	[50.197.141.106])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jd5sm5697235pbd.35.2015.04.15.22.06.03
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1429160762.7346.162.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Kathleen Nichols <nichols@pollere.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:06:02 -0700
In-Reply-To: <552F37A6.1070307@pollere.com>
References: <CAA93jw4ewK-ZEj0Fw14=Vwzk2xphiLZS4bdi95oJXLLPuRKPwg@mail.gmail.com>
	<552F37A6.1070307@pollere.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] hard limit codel
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 05:06:33 -0000

Oh well. Today really was a bad day for me.

Fortunately, tomorrow is almost there. 

On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 21:16 -0700, Kathleen Nichols wrote:
> ...otherwise known as "limiting the size of buffers"?
> 
> Go ahead, Dave, surely liquor doesn't keep you from laughing.
> 
> Gee, I thought the code was copyrighted.
> 
> On 4/15/15 8:23 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> > I reserve comment until after the liquor wears off:
> > 
> > http://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2015/IMECS2015_pp615-619.pdf
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Codel mailing list
> Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel