From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pf0-x22c.google.com (mail-pf0-x22c.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22c])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F19A23B260;
 Mon,  2 May 2016 11:04:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 206so80192611pfu.0;
 Mon, 02 May 2016 08:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=zXd/T3fI4mOqhTpK4dXp205nJS+cKUemZWLAFNd3Ei0=;
 b=D2ahttDAPm1WXQsxqFSDTAysCNLuJpqIP/0CgNJmcZqjHzJh8EPQVfA/e+4YQzobV8
 d00Xkz88Hy0lIGlFBeiYhP7hFq7D38FFuebu9MqagAGVSjZRKdPiMhdlgZsfeBDjabUn
 Emq7xd0Zk4PaKG/6OG1LDK7EQXcU4fK6ZzINZKdvmVFvs70V7dCkfEOJnzZMdjs4iKgD
 iotnFXnjHEyV27dG5To84bSuQM++oNIzIvmDjg76VTqJCCrXp3TtYQ6uV8jdafKcpbfV
 d8NZ/UWnztUW2SzI6gWZonsaAJ6DK72OpvrrrMYB+/6225wD8lwW9OGqMfmws9TrKute
 zeaA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=zXd/T3fI4mOqhTpK4dXp205nJS+cKUemZWLAFNd3Ei0=;
 b=WOOvvPu8bHGpMR+QAl8shfIPfyfIhTJeT1ZqakrGns5cYhQ/CUSLdxYn3lS6uOxLSF
 pR/QlUeNIZPDKBuOBqv7/htw2p4ZhZbMOZ7VSbjgGq2xw8gfW78jIAObRqBY0uZUfkP6
 0A152woDIZZRC0hUWOoD6tYqWfzZAYtlXD0iEioWdYtSZus0QzUzroYhaAG0+FeiIjVk
 51WG7/zOpO4h35kYX6VSQg6rGZ0Id79H25CWg0KdPqenDuolPzgnLIak1XXhYewNEM1I
 qmogXdyyoKrE8+Hth38TrnYed49JK95WhMcZ31fQeJorjNhP6R3THrcC8Rv6NC4i/UGs
 6cIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUHkKtnJg4JbyPqQpybYwlZ/JrcYPbEYZavupkAqv36TSTavRNVm44YdWXo2c8ByA==
X-Received: by 10.98.98.1 with SMTP id w1mr52683034pfb.117.1462201446269;
 Mon, 02 May 2016 08:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620:0:1000:1704:b5a3:bf52:77a3:bc9a?
 ([2620:0:1000:1704:b5a3:bf52:77a3:bc9a])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
 v185sm13409069pfb.72.2016.05.02.08.04.05
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Mon, 02 May 2016 08:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1462201445.5535.247.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Roman Yeryomin <leroi.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, 
 "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
 <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>, ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 08:04:05 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CACiydbL0K2fQT4EXm4LjDaxDLC+AVj9szTpyHq2iUwuPVNNz+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw6QLyx9EaS+ntB0D3duoysu_Z-UYyQfHnRa=pfqPDfWOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1462125592.5535.194.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
 <CACiydbL0K2fQT4EXm4LjDaxDLC+AVj9szTpyHq2iUwuPVNNz+g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Codel] fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
 <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
 <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 15:04:07 -0000

On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 17:09 +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote:

> So if I run some UDP download you will just kill me? Sounds broken.
> 

Seriously guys, I never suggesting kill a _task_ but the _flow_

Meaning dropping packets. See ?

If you do not want to drop packets, do not use fq_codel and simply use
bufferbloat pfifo_fast.