CoDel AQM discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Cc: dave.taht@bufferbloat.net, nanditad@google.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, codel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	ycheng@google.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, mattmathis@google.com
Subject: Re: [Codel] [PATCH net-next] codel: use Newton method instead of sqrt() and divides
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 16:45:13 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120512.164513.1156706853054390966.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336855256.31653.1329.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 22:40:56 +0200

> 24 bit of precision for the reciprocal value is more than enough (Van
> suggested 16 bits in fact), so we have actually room for 7 bits if
> needed.

Using a u16 would also work for me.

> By the way, gcc on x86 generates nice "and 0xfffffffe,%eax" instruction
> for (vars->rec_inv_sqrt << 1).

Yeah but what do stores of ->rec_inv_sqrt look like?

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-12 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-12 13:32 Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 19:52 ` David Miller
2012-05-12 20:40   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 20:45     ` David Miller [this message]
2012-05-12 21:48       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 21:52         ` David Miller
2012-05-13  7:23           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14  5:46             ` Andrew McGregor
2012-05-14  6:00               ` dave taht
2012-05-14  6:17                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14  6:33                   ` dave taht
2012-05-14  6:47                     ` dave taht
2012-05-14  6:51                       ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14  8:23                         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14  8:50                           ` dave taht
2012-05-14  9:03                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 11:34                           ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14 11:56                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 15:05                             ` Dave Taht
2012-05-14 18:31                               ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14 22:33             ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120512.164513.1156706853054390966.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=mattmathis@google.com \
    --cc=nanditad@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox