From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Received: from mail-pb0-x22f.google.com (mail-pb0-x22f.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22f])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80F6121F1D4
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 14 May 2013 08:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id rr4so537734pbb.6
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 14 May 2013 08:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;
	bh=nwsfPfjdxZHNcO+xaX3cXVIBMkCaEv2VevrshRxqEus=;
	b=WBHREREg8l5eGLl55R8SiQy8EkKoh2izXcdst5Tdqk64gc3tpyjd2mBfG0pEyEFtPm
	NYj0VuoreQ9enT76JI20nOfTC9HM6fqCQ8oMfv/xJsiV6mxRxv125w43SyCCA9nHn4aI
	hdI2wwLrAnlzbf9j+E8Af/cEngPPcnLvEf/dKePVZ93J8APMKr+/Voffu59is17lxw3l
	1BpGA3IwTmUtQv4zDFGIrJWJ3lorKWkZiftNGxyHEltqwPmy+eQw65A/IBOiu61+ZLvq
	LUMPwmuyX8vXfg4Y/fz01WRsZ/QND4njQobs9N0iDo65AO6oDp8XPh/2txmN2rZOxNTU
	5f+Q==
X-Received: by 10.66.74.170 with SMTP id u10mr35571496pav.202.1368546450100;
	Tue, 14 May 2013 08:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net
	(static-50-53-71-109.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.71.109])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
	uq10sm18735730pbc.5.2013.05.14.08.47.28 for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Tue, 14 May 2013 08:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 08:47:26 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20130514084726.0fcd715a@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130514154838.2d9622b7@redhat.com>
References: <20130514154838.2d9622b7@redhat.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnjMTKNA4qsbgjNCWKVPgRy6P+tD9gsIS6bjsv/zO3agVbwbOX8Rx/g/Zc0fZBHfjnrx+yV
Cc: "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Codel] [Bloat] Network test tools for many parallel/concurrent
 connections?
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 15:47:30 -0000

On Tue, 14 May 2013 15:48:38 +0200
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com> wrote:

> 
> (I'm testing fq_codel and codel)
> 
> I need a test tool that can start many TCP streams (>1024).
> During/after the testrun I want to know if the connections got a fair
> share of the bandwidth.
> 
> Can anyone recomment tools for this?
> 
> After the test I would also like to, "deep-dive" analyse one of the TCP
> streams to see how the congestion window, outstanding-win/data is
> behaving.  Back in 2005 I used-to-use a tool  called
> "tcptrace" (http://www.tcptrace.org).
> Have any better tools surfaced?
> 


You may want to look at some of the "realistic" load tools since
in real life not all flows are 100% of bandwidth and long lived.