From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260BF21F1EA;
	Tue, 14 May 2013 12:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4EJKWIG010290
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
	Tue, 14 May 2013 15:20:32 -0400
Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-64.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.64])
	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP
	id r4EJKU30003070; Tue, 14 May 2013 15:20:30 -0400
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 21:20:27 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Message-ID: <20130514212027.007f6060@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130514084726.0fcd715a@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
References: <20130514154838.2d9622b7@redhat.com>
	<20130514084726.0fcd715a@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Organization: Red Hat Inc.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11
Cc: "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Codel] [Bloat] Network test tools for many parallel/concurrent
 connections?
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 19:20:33 -0000

On Tue, 14 May 2013 08:47:26 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:

> You may want to look at some of the "realistic" load tools since
> in real life not all flows are 100% of bandwidth and long lived.

Well perhaps it would be easier to use some apache load test tool, but
in this test scenario I just want see how well fq_codel scales with
many concurrent bulk transfers.

Can people on the list recommend any commercial test-equip solutions?

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer