From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com (mail-pd0-f175.google.com [209.85.192.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 176C421F1FD for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id v10so419370pde.6 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:07:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type; bh=sE6VRWizmuzx3F0immJnedPa1g4BLvotuWxcl0P1c0w=; b=MSGLafH1nZ3im+CXxbp/TMjdIiOY3tI80w7qAZPuzO9W0oK3sTkqi2NCfMR0G4bsbS +3aKAwjzK4RX8ZZLs9oPz/pfP1e1M9Z2kQD96u5FRwwzeOrlW8t6RdURFtN2R2MJrEj3 0BC2ZKkDv6LwdjEqBWdD0Fudn2gxSgUTwQL4SXoacp/G+f8q34CBpHsZEEjZOISrq5r5 nHbC0GCrQ8F72v10mlxc4SZydVmLfI/YfuMELPFjjYWgRigqt7ItErm6oHSTXW7WcHQO FhOKIys52Ek+pJPqRUNsEpbDLZcNrzDpv6aR1ZqhBmesRyFsgIQFqpOhwpDQ7Na7y3Jq SvoA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmSmKyA6XAnGNi+wST4rh+UqiXFtNqnih8IL2eRK5L2r078Is8L0VEUcT6lgSKcuAmP3lA/ X-Received: by 10.66.97.67 with SMTP id dy3mr3020207pab.24.1403626038002; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:07:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net (static-50-53-83-51.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.83.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id co3sm1028933pbb.89.2014.06.24.09.07.17 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:07:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:07:14 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: "Brian J. Murrell" Message-ID: <20140624090714.53def1e7@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> In-Reply-To: <1403616175.3478.731.camel@pc.interlinx.bc.ca> References: <1403616175.3478.731.camel@pc.interlinx.bc.ca> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/ks6Rt5R2Jup6bQ+WKau1B3N"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Codel] what am i doing wrong? why isn't codel working? X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:07:20 -0000 --Sig_/ks6Rt5R2Jup6bQ+WKau1B3N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:22:55 -0400 "Brian J. Murrell" wrote: > So first thing to notice is that this router has two WAN interfaces but > only one of them (pppoe-wan1) has had codel applied. The other WAN > interface (eth0.2) is not even listed. I suspect that is a VLAN. VLAN's have no real underlying queue, the queue exists at the device driver for the Ethernet device (eth0). --Sig_/ks6Rt5R2Jup6bQ+WKau1B3N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTqaIyAAoJEICnf2CVzeR+4ukP/j0Ucfyrf8nS8ti5DsIAuAkP t8J0ZX3m78agEi8B5JEqAlZq0V7HXPy9Xcf3yqHG7Gmf+nxVihLXZ8qnZerALk9O C3eNnJFhH0+K3xfP1YZYUCW+mwCkgV7ZKF2p9AdxyEKAcZiEG4FzfPuzLM/9/e+l y7slp9wkTYTF7e3wKBM7aC39OTLBe9yleaoHld0FN06cAtHcCGc/zCw3AGc9xZMa 5NZzXFUIFDQDNLsCmGhN38htz/YJUUhVYAReSiy6LTZwR5uy40WbmLk7hCIauupt acxrnwdoeADvxE92rwHTNIkOL9O3NKISIahXgkohyaei3k/2X7FTz1Qg2DTg0vu8 SEuxrzHqD6gI+HD8ZB6I2Pp53Jf65ANPYEaDCyIaP5njN4O8PxC6tPb6y9UoQP6m +epf7unz618iJoh9k75hfXzVBrcdCCzHbAVjbvTLZxDmWiYtNf2fa6IG82jUdEm3 RUf6QXC3zPIqhWuIpV0n/AF9yowSi+/TRSISF8G0EwgEwG9969Anxyx76sSwsIcZ +p1gLFrQbg01dBelgpSxewN6liAVVDFeJVF6TxAUZsckMspPaVcMp4UQGBJc5WXb vzjn51JeYda7NKRh75pwSE9ZUo0+ZqV0OjxLln14Ti5VE7X4YZ5bYC1m+8qcYOqx Pe5+24phdrvX4eZ0/fAJ =NXcV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ks6Rt5R2Jup6bQ+WKau1B3N--