From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Received: from mail-ie0-f169.google.com (mail-ie0-f169.google.com
	[209.85.223.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E35A21F3AE
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:14:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iecrd18 with SMTP id rd18so22730008iec.5
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:14:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=/7Uk5x3RWuOmp9gA9/iYIa8wY6wueHLinDzsv9t2Cwg=;
	b=cSiacxQFshYP3SmSOUIXJ81E4IrDujPyJb2fK9LzR0AC4U2gz5zDk7+HmD0KB61y+l
	meQb6iEyz+Idow9wsLOTySahNdva1F8xSWF35RI2UcvmJTcFtGAOwnT0qrZrI+miyKkQ
	GMtFCT975C11Aw7yxSJo2SW2/LCFKV95ghuwE+DtIbn7+30WLo2w6X+9G5b5rH/f5re7
	RRfoAQzPQCu8ViYX9dLZ34EhVefcPimc70TO1z5vB9lVJv+cdSgqjbRBbnlhJQE7GiyT
	y1Ww28OXcSBWdbbsCJIOMVSvQQoH1pzEERc4/WF3ZRe4mXpU1HTRy1O4S3MJQuVNcIeQ
	zzig==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkfzri4YaBvvE89Crk7fOQpxfTnz3NTwZ27j0ZX3u8+1Oyy6sY+pGkUeGcw3bLMK3ygbmqF
X-Received: by 10.42.150.9 with SMTP id y9mr11683067icv.46.1424992496473;
	Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:14:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from urahara (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net.
	[50.53.82.155])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y2sm1235160ioi.8.2015.02.26.15.14.55
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:14:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:14:57 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Richard Scheffenegger" <rscheff@gmx.at>
Message-ID: <20150226151457.75fc898b@urahara>
In-Reply-To: <5EDCCC18D27F4F039FA971B3C834A466@srichardlxp2>
References: <CAONkte9+XLPomhAkwoN6hwGz6a0BkbBDDQF__mGpRaTvB8XcRA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5EDCCC18D27F4F039FA971B3C834A466@srichardlxp2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: divya singla <divyasingla1989@gmail.com>, codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] About Packet Drop in Codel
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 23:15:26 -0000

On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:32:58 +0100
"Richard Scheffenegger" <rscheff@gmx.at> wrote:

> Hi Members,
> i am doing M.tech and my research topic is AQM.
> i tried to run codel with ns-2.35.
> And i found packet loss is more in codel as compared to RED.

More packet loss is no necessarily a bad thing.
You need to measure throughput and latency together.