From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan <mohammed@codeaurora.org>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
codel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Tim Shepard <shep@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [Codel] [RFCv2 2/3] ath10k: report per-station tx/rate rates to mac80211
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:53:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160324122317.GB30872@atheros-ThinkPad-T61> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQmRBog+oSMCKUUzTV1Jm_Mip0ZA9mnpkZ14hDUq32Dszg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 08:49:12AM +0100, Michal Kazior wrote:
> On 24 March 2016 at 08:19, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
> <mohammed@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:17:57AM +0100, Michal Kazior wrote:
> >> The rate control is offloaded by firmware so it's
> >> challanging to provide expected throughput value
> >> for given station.
> >>
> >> This approach is naive as it reports last tx rate
> >> used for given station as provided by firmware
> >> stat event.
> >>
> >> This should be sufficient for airtime estimation
> >> used for fq-codel-in-mac80211 tx scheduling
> >> purposes now.
> >>
> >> This patch uses a very hacky way to get the stats.
> >> This is sufficient for proof-of-concept but must
> >> be cleaned up properly eventually.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h | 5 +++
> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/debug.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 26 ++++++++------
> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h | 2 +-
> >> 4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
> >> index 23ba03fb7a5f..3f76669d44cf 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
> >> @@ -331,6 +331,9 @@ struct ath10k_sta {
> >> /* protected by conf_mutex */
> >> bool aggr_mode;
> >> u64 rx_duration;
> >> +
> >> + u32 tx_rate_kbps;
> >> + u32 rx_rate_kbps;
> >> #endif
> >> };
> >>
> >> @@ -372,6 +375,8 @@ struct ath10k_vif {
> >> s8 def_wep_key_idx;
> >>
> >> u16 tx_seq_no;
> >> + u32 tx_rate_kbps;
> >> + u32 rx_rate_kbps;
> >>
> >> union {
> >> struct {
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/debug.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/debug.c
> >> index 076d29b53ddf..cc7ebf04ae00 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/debug.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/debug.c
> >> @@ -316,6 +316,58 @@ static void ath10k_debug_fw_stats_reset(struct ath10k *ar)
> >> spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void ath10k_mac_update_txrx_rate_iter(void *data,
> >> + u8 *mac,
> >> + struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
> >> +{
> >> + struct ath10k_fw_stats_peer *peer = data;
> >> + struct ath10k_vif *arvif;
> >> +
> >> + if (memcmp(vif->addr, peer->peer_macaddr, ETH_ALEN))
> >> + return;
> >> +
> >> + arvif = (void *)vif->drv_priv;
> >> + arvif->tx_rate_kbps = peer->peer_tx_rate;
> >> + arvif->rx_rate_kbps = peer->peer_rx_rate;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void ath10k_mac_update_txrx_rate(struct ath10k *ar,
> >> + struct ath10k_fw_stats *stats)
> >> +{
> >> + struct ieee80211_hw *hw = ar->hw;
> >> + struct ath10k_fw_stats_peer *peer;
> >> + struct ath10k_sta *arsta;
> >> + struct ieee80211_sta *sta;
> >> + const u8 *localaddr = NULL;
> >> +
> >> + rcu_read_lock();
> >> +
> >> + list_for_each_entry(peer, &stats->peers, list) {
> >> + /* This doesn't account for multiple STA connected on different
> >> + * vifs. Unfortunately there's no way to derive that from the available
> >> + * information.
> >> + */
> >> + sta = ieee80211_find_sta_by_ifaddr(hw,
> >> + peer->peer_macaddr,
> >> + localaddr);
> >> + if (!sta) {
> >> + /* This tries to update multicast rates */
> >> + ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces_atomic(
> >> + hw,
> >> + IEEE80211_IFACE_ITER_NORMAL,
> >> + ath10k_mac_update_txrx_rate_iter,
> >> + peer);
> >> + continue;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + arsta = (void *)sta->drv_priv;
> >> + arsta->tx_rate_kbps = peer->peer_tx_rate;
> >> + arsta->rx_rate_kbps = peer->peer_rx_rate;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + rcu_read_unlock();
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> void ath10k_debug_fw_stats_process(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >> {
> >> struct ath10k_fw_stats stats = {};
> >> @@ -335,6 +387,8 @@ void ath10k_debug_fw_stats_process(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >> goto free;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + ath10k_mac_update_txrx_rate(ar, &stats);
> >> +
> >> /* Stat data may exceed htc-wmi buffer limit. In such case firmware
> >> * splits the stats data and delivers it in a ping-pong fashion of
> >> * request cmd-update event.
> >> @@ -351,13 +405,6 @@ void ath10k_debug_fw_stats_process(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >> if (peer_stats_svc)
> >> ath10k_sta_update_rx_duration(ar, &stats.peers);
> >>
> >> - if (ar->debug.fw_stats_done) {
> >> - if (!peer_stats_svc)
> >> - ath10k_warn(ar, "received unsolicited stats update event\n");
> >> -
> >> - goto free;
> >> - }
> >> -
> >
> > [shafi] As you had suggested previously, should we completely clean up this ping
> > - pong response approach for f/w stats, (or) this should be retained to support
> > backward compatibility and also for supporting ping - pong response when user
> > cats for fw-stats (via debugfs) (i did see in the commit message this needs to
> > be cleaned up)
>
> I think it makes sense to remove the ping-pong logic and rely on
> periodic updates alone, including fw_stats and ethstats handling.
>
>
> >> - if (test_bit(WMI_SERVICE_PEER_STATS, ar->wmi.svc_map)) {
> >> - param = ar->wmi.pdev_param->peer_stats_update_period;
> >> - ret = ath10k_wmi_pdev_set_param(ar, param,
> >> - PEER_DEFAULT_STATS_UPDATE_PERIOD);
> >> - if (ret) {
> >> - ath10k_warn(ar,
> >> - "failed to set peer stats period : %d\n",
> >> - ret);
> >> - goto err_core_stop;
> >> - }
> >> + param = ar->wmi.pdev_param->peer_stats_update_period;
> >> + ret = ath10k_wmi_pdev_set_param(ar, param,
> >> + PEER_DEFAULT_STATS_UPDATE_PERIOD);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + ath10k_warn(ar,
> >> + "failed to set peer stats period : %d\n",
> >> + ret);
> >> + goto err_core_stop;
> >> }
> >
> > [shafi] If i am correct this change requires 'PEER_STATS' to be enabled by
> > default.
>
> No, it does not. Periodic stats have been available since forever.
[shafi] Michal, sorry i was talking about enabling WMI_PEER_STATS feature for
10.2, and we have a patch pushed recently to reduce the number of peers if
'WMI_PEER_STATS' feature is enabled(avoiding f/w crash due to memory
constraints) . But this patch requires the feature to be
turned ON always (with periodic stats update as well for evey 100ms). Please
correct me if my understanding is wrong.
>
>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h
> >> index 4d3cbc44fcd2..2877a3a27b95 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h
> >> @@ -3296,7 +3296,7 @@ struct wmi_csa_event {
> >> /* the definition of different PDEV parameters */
> >> #define PDEV_DEFAULT_STATS_UPDATE_PERIOD 500
> >> #define VDEV_DEFAULT_STATS_UPDATE_PERIOD 500
> >> -#define PEER_DEFAULT_STATS_UPDATE_PERIOD 500
> >> +#define PEER_DEFAULT_STATS_UPDATE_PERIOD 100
> >
> > [shafi] Is this for more granularity since 500ms is not sufficient ?, I understand
> > the firmware has default stats_update_period as 500ms and i hope it supports
> > 100ms as well, Also if we are going to support period stats update we may need to
> > accumulate the information in driver (like this change and rx_duration
>
> The patch is used for rough rate estimation which is used to keep Tx
> queues filled only with 1-2 txops worth of data. Signal conditions can
> change vastly so I figured I need the peer stat update events come
> more often. I didn't really verify if they come every 100ms. The patch
> already served it's job as a proof-of-concept for smarter tx queuing.
[shafi] Ok, sure. I understand very soon we will get this in ath10k as well
(though it is a POC)
>
> > I will try to take this change, rebase it to TOT and see how it goes.
>
> There's really no benefit it taking this patch as a basis for periodic
> stat handling. Majority of this patch is just handling peer_tx_rate
> for rate estimation purposes. Feel free to knock yourself out with
> ripping out the ping-pong stat stuff though :)
>
[shafi] sure Michal, thanks !
regards,
shafi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-24 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-16 10:17 [Codel] [RFCv2 0/3] mac80211: implement fq codel Michal Kazior
2016-03-16 10:17 ` [Codel] [RFCv2 1/3] mac80211: implement fq_codel for software queuing Michal Kazior
2016-03-22 1:35 ` [Codel] [Make-wifi-fast] " David Lang
2016-03-22 6:51 ` Michal Kazior
2016-03-16 10:17 ` [Codel] [RFCv2 2/3] ath10k: report per-station tx/rate rates to mac80211 Michal Kazior
2016-03-24 7:19 ` Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
2016-03-24 7:49 ` Michal Kazior
2016-03-24 12:23 ` Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan [this message]
2016-03-24 12:31 ` Michal Kazior
2016-03-16 10:17 ` [Codel] [RFCv2 3/3] ath10k: use ieee80211_tx_schedule() Michal Kazior
2016-03-16 10:26 ` [Codel] [RFCv2 0/3] mac80211: implement fq codel Michal Kazior
2016-03-16 15:37 ` Dave Taht
2016-03-16 18:36 ` Dave Taht
2016-03-16 18:55 ` Bob Copeland
2016-03-16 19:49 ` Jasmine Strong
2016-03-17 8:55 ` Michal Kazior
2016-03-17 11:12 ` Bob Copeland
2016-03-17 17:00 ` Dave Taht
2016-03-17 17:24 ` Rick Jones
2016-03-21 11:57 ` Michal Kazior
2016-03-17 9:43 ` Michal Kazior
2016-03-17 9:03 ` Michal Kazior
2016-03-25 9:27 ` [Codel] [PATCH 0/2] mac80211: implement fq_codel Michal Kazior
2016-03-25 9:27 ` [Codel] [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: implement fair queuing per txq Michal Kazior
[not found] ` <CAHqTa-0yEFYAFpSKyko1ET33GsN==_D8TpBeq6AtwLj4XMTW0A@mail.gmail.com>
2016-04-11 7:25 ` Michal Kazior
2016-03-25 9:27 ` [Codel] [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: expose some txq/fq internals and knobs via debugfs Michal Kazior
2016-03-31 10:28 ` [Codel] [PATCHv2 0/2] mac80211: implement fq_codel Michal Kazior
2016-03-31 10:28 ` [Codel] [PATCHv2 1/2] mac80211: implement fair queuing per txq Michal Kazior
2016-04-05 13:57 ` Johannes Berg
2016-04-05 14:32 ` Dave Taht
[not found] ` <1459927276.17504.6.camel@sipsolutions.net>
2016-04-06 17:39 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-07 8:53 ` Johannes Berg
2016-04-06 5:35 ` Michal Kazior
2016-04-06 6:03 ` [Codel] [Make-wifi-fast] " Jonathan Morton
2016-04-06 7:16 ` Michal Kazior
2016-04-06 16:46 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-04-06 7:19 ` [Codel] " Johannes Berg
2016-03-31 10:28 ` [Codel] [PATCHv2 2/2] mac80211: expose some txq/fq internals and knobs via debugfs Michal Kazior
2016-04-14 12:18 ` [Codel] [PATCHv3 0/5] mac80211: implement fq_codel Michal Kazior
2016-04-14 12:18 ` [Codel] [PATCHv3 1/5] mac80211: skip netdev queue control with software queuing Michal Kazior
2016-04-16 22:21 ` Johannes Berg
2016-04-18 5:39 ` Michal Kazior
2016-04-14 12:18 ` [Codel] [PATCHv3 2/5] mac80211: implement fair queueing per txq Michal Kazior
2016-04-16 22:23 ` Johannes Berg
2016-04-16 22:25 ` Johannes Berg
2016-04-18 5:16 ` Michal Kazior
2016-04-18 12:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-18 13:36 ` Michal Kazior
2016-04-19 9:10 ` Johannes Berg
2016-04-14 12:18 ` [Codel] [PATCHv3 3/5] mac80211: add debug knobs for fair queuing Michal Kazior
2016-04-14 12:18 ` [Codel] [PATCHv3 4/5] mac80211: implement codel on fair queuing flows Michal Kazior
2016-04-16 22:29 ` Johannes Berg
2016-04-18 5:31 ` Michal Kazior
2016-04-18 12:38 ` Michal Kazior
2016-04-19 9:06 ` Johannes Berg
2016-04-19 9:31 ` Michal Kazior
2016-04-19 9:57 ` Johannes Berg
2016-04-14 12:18 ` [Codel] [PATCHv3 5/5] mac80211: add debug knobs for codel Michal Kazior
2016-05-05 11:00 ` [Codel] [PATCHv4 0/5] mac80211: implement fq_codel Michal Kazior
2016-05-05 11:00 ` [Codel] [PATCHv4 1/5] mac80211: skip netdev queue control with software queuing Michal Kazior
2016-05-09 12:28 ` Michal Kazior
2016-05-05 11:00 ` [Codel] [PATCHv4 2/5] mac80211: implement fair queueing per txq Michal Kazior
2016-05-05 11:00 ` [Codel] [PATCHv4 3/5] mac80211: add debug knobs for fair queuing Michal Kazior
2016-06-09 9:48 ` Johannes Berg
2016-05-05 11:00 ` [Codel] [PATCHv4 4/5] mac80211: implement codel on fair queuing flows Michal Kazior
2016-05-05 15:30 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-05 11:00 ` [Codel] [PATCHv4 5/5] mac80211: add debug knobs for codel Michal Kazior
2016-05-05 15:21 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-06 5:27 ` Michal Kazior
2016-05-06 5:51 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-06 6:33 ` Michal Kazior
2016-05-06 7:23 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160324122317.GB30872@atheros-ThinkPad-T61 \
--to=mohammed@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shep@alum.mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox