From: Kathleen Nichols <nichols@pollere.com>
To: codel@bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Codel] update, question
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:14:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9AC5CA.1080405@pollere.com> (raw)
ACM Queue folks are very quick and have sent us an edited version of the
paper.
We are now the bottleneck as Van has another paper with a deadline (and I'm
one of the guest editors waiting for it, so it gets priority!) but we
hope to get it
back to them before Monday. So I assume it will go up on Queue soon.
I am going to put out some of the other results asap.
So I came home and told Van about our Tuesday meeting and some of the
questions
and comments. He suggested I try to run a "datacenter" type scenario.
Well, okay,
easier said than done. ns-2 becomes very unhappy with a 10G link though
1G seems
okay with shorter simulation time than I've been running. I let the
buffers be set
to a "nominal" BDP which means they are huge for a 5ms RTT. Initially,
they fill up
and, because the control interval is longish compared to 5ms and the
pipe size is
big, it take a while (order 3 sec) for CoDel to start controlling after
which it does
so just fine. This is preliminary and not real scientific, but I was
wondering if anyone
could suggest any particuar wrinkles to this that make things more
realistic. I'm thinking
of using a smaller buffer size size it just leads to 3 uninteresting
seconds of sim time.
Getting a better wireless model might be interesting...
Kathie
reply other threads:[~2012-04-27 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F9AC5CA.1080405@pollere.com \
--to=nichols@pollere.com \
--cc=codel@bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox