CoDel AQM discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kathleen Nichols <nichols@pollere.com>
To: codel@bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Codel] update, question
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:14:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9AC5CA.1080405@pollere.com> (raw)


ACM Queue folks are very quick and have sent us an edited version of the
paper.
We are now the bottleneck as Van has another paper with a deadline (and I'm
one of the guest editors waiting for it, so it gets priority!) but we
hope to get it
back to them before Monday. So I assume it will go up on Queue soon.

I am going to put out some of the other results asap.

So I came home and told Van about our Tuesday meeting and some of the
questions
and comments. He suggested I try to run a "datacenter" type scenario.
Well, okay,
easier said than done. ns-2 becomes very unhappy with a 10G link though
1G seems
okay with shorter simulation time than I've been running. I let the
buffers be set
to a "nominal" BDP which means they are huge for a 5ms RTT. Initially,
they fill up
and, because the control interval is longish compared to 5ms and the
pipe size is
big, it take a while (order 3 sec) for CoDel to start controlling after
which it does
so just fine. This is preliminary and not real scientific, but I was
wondering if anyone
could suggest any particuar wrinkles to this that make things more
realistic. I'm thinking
of using a smaller buffer size size it just leads to 3 uninteresting
seconds of sim time.

Getting a better wireless model might be interesting...

	Kathie

                 reply	other threads:[~2012-04-27 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F9AC5CA.1080405@pollere.com \
    --to=nichols@pollere.com \
    --cc=codel@bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox