* [Codel] update, question
@ 2012-04-27 16:14 Kathleen Nichols
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Kathleen Nichols @ 2012-04-27 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: codel
ACM Queue folks are very quick and have sent us an edited version of the
paper.
We are now the bottleneck as Van has another paper with a deadline (and I'm
one of the guest editors waiting for it, so it gets priority!) but we
hope to get it
back to them before Monday. So I assume it will go up on Queue soon.
I am going to put out some of the other results asap.
So I came home and told Van about our Tuesday meeting and some of the
questions
and comments. He suggested I try to run a "datacenter" type scenario.
Well, okay,
easier said than done. ns-2 becomes very unhappy with a 10G link though
1G seems
okay with shorter simulation time than I've been running. I let the
buffers be set
to a "nominal" BDP which means they are huge for a 5ms RTT. Initially,
they fill up
and, because the control interval is longish compared to 5ms and the
pipe size is
big, it take a while (order 3 sec) for CoDel to start controlling after
which it does
so just fine. This is preliminary and not real scientific, but I was
wondering if anyone
could suggest any particuar wrinkles to this that make things more
realistic. I'm thinking
of using a smaller buffer size size it just leads to 3 uninteresting
seconds of sim time.
Getting a better wireless model might be interesting...
Kathie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-04-27 16:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-27 16:14 [Codel] update, question Kathleen Nichols
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox