From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gettysjim@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qa0-f50.google.com (mail-qa0-f50.google.com
	[209.85.216.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FCA4200BFD
	for <codel@bufferbloat.net>; Wed,  2 May 2012 10:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qafl39 with SMTP id l39so864431qaf.9
	for <codel@bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 02 May 2012 10:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=sender:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to
	:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=mopeC09TFcKpmQcXaFp6cMzBoed5Nh3bgb1GUPrQIOQ=;
	b=RHkMOJUl+y//xdM6nz9KcTYy3fHVssEwY3oCnI9o91TnR0b1RlTHKpdfHJ1veegdng
	ynGdBC2pH590jgL42YFPW50GEmoE1iMCBqk1IyR4UoHsijcirkR9p3vb4p+OrCWY4MiG
	AcATJBXfrp10cC2UCLpi5xH2rAbqA/0LbABl5kbWNmm7tMnJgY9BmM395QomrHAjDueU
	ujApmS+mdvLM3fxiVem4qBBsfAM16ukTOpzW1qmg8hEiBbnv7NKSSWA1G/EAIXnUh731
	/YN1afWQ+XkiFM8RYx1Ia4+hmk8KpQVUkP7228IDlTZ3egiBdh4hGMdCnGh4PDGWvFVF
	BiGg==
Received: by 10.229.136.21 with SMTP id p21mr2689332qct.44.1335979921886;
	Wed, 02 May 2012 10:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.4] (c-50-138-170-142.hsd1.ma.comcast.net.
	[50.138.170.142])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gb7sm4249590qab.12.2012.05.02.10.32.00
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 May 2012 10:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Jim Gettys <gettysjim@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4FA16F8F.20106@freedesktop.org>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 13:31:59 -0400
From: Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org>
Organization: Bell Labs
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kathleen Nichols <nichols@pollere.com>
References: <4FA14EA8.3020301@freedesktop.org> <4FA16D8B.1000506@hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FA16D8B.1000506@hp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: codel@bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] Schedule for publication of "Controlling Queue Delay"
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/private/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 17:32:03 -0000

On 05/02/2012 01:23 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
>
>> P.S. Let's try to be pro-active about pronunciation: I like the way
>> Kathie said "coddle", rather than Co-Del; it's sort of warm and fuzzy:
>> the wiktionary definition is "To treat gently or with great care.",
>> which I also like....
>
> Well, there is also the connotation of being overly protected :)
>
> If it is spelled CoDel getting it pronounced like coddle will be very
> difficult.  To get it widely pronounced like coddle it really should
> be presented as CoDl or somesuch.
>
Kathie?  up for a spelling change?  It's certainly how you pronounce
it....  It's not quite too late...

And the implication of "coddling" packets is a good one, given the
aversion some have to dropping packets....
                            - Jim