From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nichols@pollere.com>
Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.72])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BE96200BE8
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri,  4 May 2012 16:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c-24-4-217-203.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.4.217.203]
	helo=kmnmba.local)
	by mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nichols@pollere.com>)
	id 1SQS95-000NC9-J9; Fri, 04 May 2012 23:42:43 +0000
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS
X-Originating-IP: 24.4.217.203
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see
	http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for
	abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19RK5KVZdFic70wDamM7JDIOJtDoGGwmLE=
Message-ID: <4FA46971.4000702@pollere.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 16:42:41 -0700
From: Kathleen Nichols <nichols@pollere.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
	rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
References: <CAA93jw49KZZHBfb47cGN7tTxw8RbGzHHEVodhdpzmbOp78CREQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FA3F248.3070101@freedesktop.org>
	<CAA93jw4wzVLrMOq+RzP2FTHCHaPrFAY06xJX=Q94nPO0z2-OcQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FA3F50D.7080406@freedesktop.org>
	<1336146993.3752.354.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAA93jw7Mo0QdhgKk2p+LeT_esv6TSA2qhgK5Xg7YzcDHX=z3WA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw6uf+EnoEPGWA5tS7kY7C8j4E7knL+OmWy8niCceQvvRQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw6SLTBV7dd-NE-k-f5PqvU7XocsQC=koDu8M03ocBgrmQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6SLTBV7dd-NE-k-f5PqvU7XocsQC=koDu8M03ocBgrmQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Codel] fp sqrt vis int sqrt?
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/private/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 23:42:45 -0000


Take a deep breath.

On 5/4/12 10:44 AM, Dave Taht wrote:

>>
>> That's assuming a 100ms target, which by observation over the
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^interval
> 
> past
>> year is not what a typical tcp stream is like anymore, it's closer to
>> 50ms, particularly for elephants and cdns, less in many cases.
>>

But that really isn't going to make much difference. Interval is *loosely*
related to RTT.

>>>
>>> And I would have liked to been able to to fiddle with target (for
>>> wireless) on the fly as a function of (active_stations), with interval
>>> slaved to minstrel's idea of everything.

Might be good to know what problem you are exploring before you
fiddle.