From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pz0-f48.google.com (mail-pz0-f48.google.com [209.85.210.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A807A2012AC for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 15:16:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by dadz8 with SMTP id z8so1776652dad.7 for ; Sat, 05 May 2012 15:16:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0JJ3fIBtPxsmwWGSOmIB43spgH5DK+6TBZpv+KE6dAM=; b=z8wbJNbzOCLyAkyyTjg61KmAt9B7lkkjclYZ3hQxmwsaUTTDCzGVfSTrLAONePSdem 2sF0V9rZa9/q4atKZxV7MxAyYjfEWSh9qa88wkX62pE7wc9xAupIkjVLIdNaHFK17Bpx TeCtW/DLNxCkRYy6KGNUr/tlVI0NLCirjuJhM3gTXE9+z8Tr9TW9xvYiSbOdvBreKTPw hYrlx26qiPQL7z+sXf33Xicx4bNwprHSW5euR/492RK+G6EUPKPZZygDk50MFBUhXEep yvMGVqMmktgoSFhBXcjciMd06k5N1oGgMWrgM35pDDaGUzKMyDkhZxExIA72w9C+EFTK hSJw== Received: by 10.68.190.229 with SMTP id gt5mr31727360pbc.59.1336256163305; Sat, 05 May 2012 15:16:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:4f8:3:203::c001? ([2001:4f8:3:203::c001]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u5sm12941627pbu.76.2012.05.05.15.16.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 05 May 2012 15:16:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FA5A6A0.6090409@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 15:16:00 -0700 From: dave taht User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120410 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Dumazet References: <1336217671-20384-1-git-send-email-dave.taht@bufferbloat.net> <1336218794.3752.508.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1336229343.3752.516.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1336249251.3752.558.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1336250168.3752.560.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1336252281.3752.561.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FA597C0.7090206@gmail.com> <1336252832.3752.563.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FA5A3B8.7020808@gmail.com> <1336255783.3752.573.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1336255940.3752.574.camel@edumazet-glaptop> In-Reply-To: <1336255940.3752.574.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, =?UTF-8?B?RGF2ZSBUw6RodA==?= Subject: Re: [Codel] [PATCH v5] pkt_sched: codel: Controlled Delay AQM X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 22:16:03 -0000 On 05/05/2012 03:12 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 00:09 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> I can see count bigger than 100000 with 20 concurrent netperf > > and htb rate 200Mbit > > (If you want to reproduce the problem) I will, thx. It's WAY easier to get and analyze packet captures if you play around at 10-100Mbit and below, btw...