From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gettysjim@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com (mail-qc0-f171.google.com
	[209.85.216.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00BA021F091;
	Thu, 10 May 2012 05:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qcsp15 with SMTP id p15so1901988qcs.16
	for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 10 May 2012 05:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=sender:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to
	:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=JbPb0omfQh9qWpLU7r1qJhu93SBlLpjVrjbM4VybRfw=;
	b=hig/md/P9Dg9eE2OHgIJCz2ldeIhHux9geqUnh9Kvm2X3MurR5wOzEU8myMm03/skt
	yXlI7pCsML6NLaV7ZkZcuG4lVC5pIz8dYvthAQwxmtziFimqgQ1VJ9PzqiWRkTXh23YO
	DvEppDYCuSfc8a5N66KOGx7OYqWU1KWzkHtA9+yaTK3DFvM3z+Stsk+DgXiX91ps7JXn
	Jk/YtEv0t+9peFOCTttYkn012c7+Rp75u2DUoCQNK4Tk+GR8hI8n4iu52n1+sfin6HNz
	havkXFtpdUYzOuyBMz9UtGAQXzplEcDNRkNpaXmby/xrYS1lbksGue1xXotDozUJEmvJ
	XvVg==
Received: by 10.224.105.202 with SMTP id u10mr11479998qao.54.1336654583726;
	Thu, 10 May 2012 05:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.81] (c-50-138-160-40.hsd1.ma.comcast.net.
	[50.138.160.40])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s20sm16271310qap.16.2012.05.10.05.56.20
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 May 2012 05:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Jim Gettys <gettysjim@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4FABBAF3.4010507@freedesktop.org>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 08:56:19 -0400
From: Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org>
Organization: Bell Labs
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw7C5FYzG3x7nM6nm_wnWYDjoaWWijHvGy+RY__6C17enw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7C5FYzG3x7nM6nm_wnWYDjoaWWijHvGy+RY__6C17enw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Codel] more press...
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:56:25 -0000

On 05/10/2012 01:43 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> There was also discussion on slashdot, but I shudder at the thought of
> suggesting that anyone else here wade through it.
>
> Brahm Cohen went off on RED, without reading the codel paper...
>
> http://bramcohen.com/2012/05/07/tcp-sucks
Bram's article came out the day before the CoDel announcement.  So no,
he had had no opportunity to read the paper.  I noticed it since the
traffic to my blog went up a day before I expected it to.

I guess I'll have to do a blog entry to again remind people (and Bram)
that BitTorrent was not (and is not) the villain in the whole network
neutrality mess.  I first did a blog entry about that late in 2010, but
that was before most people knew about bufferbloat.  I wrote it when I
did to help Vint out, who was trying to inject some sanity into
discussions elsewhere; but bufferbloat really took off in a big way in a
posting that occurred a month or so later.

                    - Jim