CoDel AQM discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dave taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] [PATCH net-next] codel: use Newton method instead of sqrt() and divides
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 23:00:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB09F8D.6070403@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AE51D0C6-6ED2-42E3-A8E2-41572E187D07@gmail.com>

I am sitting here with the latest fq_codel implementation on cerowrt, and
this new 16 bit change.

With either interface, running netserver on the router, I get 
~260Mbit/sec out of it,
with fq_codel on. It's quite marvelous, as ping times stay in the 2-3ms 
range...

Running traffic through the router with two fq_codels is another story.

I get only 91.6Mbit out of it (and the cpu on the router is loafing). I 
was rather puzzled as
this is sooclose to 100Mbit as for me to assume that I had goofed and 
was running
at line rate, but no, I'm at gigE on both sides.

A) Scheduler granularity? HZ_256 and NO_HZ here. Not sure of the clock res
B) The new error in the new sqrt routine actually significant enough to 
show up

I will try a 20ms target and revert to the previous fuller precision 
version. I wish I had data on the previous version but was battling an 
entirely different bug, then.

Has anyone hooked up a chain of codel ns3 sims to each other?

Or a few gigE boxes through each other?

> _______________________________________________
> Codel mailing list
> Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel


  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-14  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-12 13:32 Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 19:52 ` David Miller
2012-05-12 20:40   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 20:45     ` David Miller
2012-05-12 21:48       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 21:52         ` David Miller
2012-05-13  7:23           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14  5:46             ` Andrew McGregor
2012-05-14  6:00               ` dave taht [this message]
2012-05-14  6:17                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14  6:33                   ` dave taht
2012-05-14  6:47                     ` dave taht
2012-05-14  6:51                       ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14  8:23                         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14  8:50                           ` dave taht
2012-05-14  9:03                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 11:34                           ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14 11:56                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 15:05                             ` Dave Taht
2012-05-14 18:31                               ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14 22:33             ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FB09F8D.6070403@gmail.com \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox