From: dave taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] [PATCH net-next] codel: use Newton method instead of sqrt() and divides
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 23:00:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB09F8D.6070403@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AE51D0C6-6ED2-42E3-A8E2-41572E187D07@gmail.com>
I am sitting here with the latest fq_codel implementation on cerowrt, and
this new 16 bit change.
With either interface, running netserver on the router, I get
~260Mbit/sec out of it,
with fq_codel on. It's quite marvelous, as ping times stay in the 2-3ms
range...
Running traffic through the router with two fq_codels is another story.
I get only 91.6Mbit out of it (and the cpu on the router is loafing). I
was rather puzzled as
this is sooclose to 100Mbit as for me to assume that I had goofed and
was running
at line rate, but no, I'm at gigE on both sides.
A) Scheduler granularity? HZ_256 and NO_HZ here. Not sure of the clock res
B) The new error in the new sqrt routine actually significant enough to
show up
I will try a 20ms target and revert to the previous fuller precision
version. I wish I had data on the previous version but was battling an
entirely different bug, then.
Has anyone hooked up a chain of codel ns3 sims to each other?
Or a few gigE boxes through each other?
> _______________________________________________
> Codel mailing list
> Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-14 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-12 13:32 Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 19:52 ` David Miller
2012-05-12 20:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 20:45 ` David Miller
2012-05-12 21:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 21:52 ` David Miller
2012-05-13 7:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 5:46 ` Andrew McGregor
2012-05-14 6:00 ` dave taht [this message]
2012-05-14 6:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 6:33 ` dave taht
2012-05-14 6:47 ` dave taht
2012-05-14 6:51 ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14 8:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 8:50 ` dave taht
2012-05-14 9:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 11:34 ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14 11:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 15:05 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-14 18:31 ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14 22:33 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB09F8D.6070403@gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox