From: dave taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] [PATCH net-next] codel: use Newton method instead of sqrt() and divides
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 23:47:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB0AA68.2000800@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB0A73F.9090501@gmail.com>
On 05/13/2012 11:33 PM, dave taht wrote:
> On 05/13/2012 11:17 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 23:00 -0700, dave taht wrote:
>>> I am sitting here with the latest fq_codel implementation on
>>> cerowrt, and
>>> this new 16 bit change.
>>>
>>> With either interface, running netserver on the router, I get
>>> ~260Mbit/sec out of it,
>>> with fq_codel on. It's quite marvelous, as ping times stay in the 2-3ms
>>> range...
>>>
>> If you disable TSO and GSO, do you still get good numbers ?
This is the first time I've had these puppies not crash in a month under
workloads like this.
*Everything* I have has TSO and GSO off by default. That stuff has cause
me no end of grief.
But for you...
I just fired up a long duration ipv6 test with TSO/GSO on the driving
host, at 1Gbit, with fq_codel on all sides... with 10 TCP_MAERTS, 10
TCP_STREAMS, over pure IPv6
and am running test for 6000 seconds. and I'm going to dinner. :)
At the moment I see ping times 1.553 avg, 5.999 max, I can do a CDF plot
of the next run.
Actually I think ipv4 fragmentation is still busted in cero, but I'm
getting ther....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-14 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-12 13:32 Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 19:52 ` David Miller
2012-05-12 20:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 20:45 ` David Miller
2012-05-12 21:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 21:52 ` David Miller
2012-05-13 7:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 5:46 ` Andrew McGregor
2012-05-14 6:00 ` dave taht
2012-05-14 6:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 6:33 ` dave taht
2012-05-14 6:47 ` dave taht [this message]
2012-05-14 6:51 ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14 8:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 8:50 ` dave taht
2012-05-14 9:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 11:34 ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14 11:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 15:05 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-14 18:31 ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14 22:33 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB0AA68.2000800@gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox