From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mas30@eecs.qmul.ac.uk>
Received: from flan-planb.eecs.qmul.ac.uk (flan-planb.eecs.qmul.ac.uk
	[138.37.95.139])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 768C6200A7A
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=eecs.qmul.ac.uk; s=beta; 
	h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID;
	bh=mR1v3FPpWrOYfEBYwmvZrZmq1YRdWQXXaaUWZW5p+YI=; 
	b=krhBNlHe8J1cXqHWn/C+24tq1168PLMFFjbDevHJbfZS2pjBxX5Imgttok7mRn96qn1XYBsWrP8ukZ9uuCPnCb6txbPCb2yhhEsJfn/Z6Wxnm7+2jtdZz5Sxybn1bh76dVFZp5Hx94mOaFXnNYeYycdpxRW9GQ/xtAgMOZFO64c=;
Received: from [77.243.69.167] (helo=[192.168.1.13])
	by smtp.eecs.qmul.ac.uk:587 with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
	authenticated as mas30 (person) (Exim 4.76_RC2)
	(envelope-from <mas30@eecs.qmul.ac.uk>) id 1TIMIh-00028U-Pe
	for codel@lists.bufferbloat.net; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:23:27 +0100
Message-ID: <506871FD.5070000@eecs.qmul.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 18:23:25 +0200
From: Mark Sammut <mas30@eecs.qmul.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:25:36 -0700
Subject: [Codel] ns-3.15 simulations using CoDel
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 16:23:30 -0000

Hi all,

I am trying to run CoDel simulations using ns-3.15 and Andrew McGregor's 
CoDel patch available at http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki.

For some reason, I am getting all delay and queue length results using 
CoDel equal to the results using DropTail. Can anyone indicate reasons 
for such performance? I am generating UDP packets using On-Off 
applications set as a Poisson Traffic generator on 10 nodes aggregated 
on a common node set as the bottleneck node. Below is the part of the 
code which implements CoDel.

   Config::SetDefault ("ns3::CoDelQueue::Mode", StringValue ("Packets"));
   Config::SetDefault ("ns3::CoDelQueue::MaxPackets", UintegerValue 
(10000));
   Config::SetDefault ("ns3::CoDelQueue::Interval", StringValue ("0.8ms"));
   Config::SetDefault ("ns3::CoDelQueue::Target", StringValue ("0.2ms"));
   Config::SetDefault ("ns3::CoDelQueue::MinBytes", UintegerValue(1500));

   CsmaHelper csma;
   csma.SetChannelAttribute ("DataRate", StringValue(LinkRate));
   csma.SetChannelAttribute ("Delay", TimeValue (Seconds (0)));
   csma.SetQueue ("ns3::CoDelQueue");

Thanks a lot for your help and best regards,
Mark