From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from g1t0029.austin.hp.com (g1t0029.austin.hp.com [15.216.28.36]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hp.com", Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 Secure Server CA - G3" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28A4721F149; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:33:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from g1t0038.austin.hp.com (g1t0038.austin.hp.com [16.236.32.44]) by g1t0029.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8075638517; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [16.103.148.51] (tardy.usa.hp.com [16.103.148.51]) by g1t0038.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B88300AD; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <507605A6.1010704@hp.com> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:32:54 -0700 From: Rick Jones User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= References: <87d30rra1s.fsf@toke.dk> <507454AA.9060206@hp.com> <87mwzvphf1.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: <87mwzvphf1.fsf@toke.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Codel] [Bloat] better testing, linux 3.6.1, cerowrt credits, other stuff X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:33:03 -0000 On 10/09/2012 12:35 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > I assume that by "infrastructure" you mean "(netperf) servers far away"? What > would be needed for a test server in terms of resources (bandwidth and > otherwise)? I could try and persuade my university to let me setup a > test server on their network (which is in Denmark)... Keep in mind that netperf needs two open ports - one for the control connection and one for the data connection. As far as an access control mechanism goes, it is pretty lame, but the 2.6.0 and later versions of netperf/netserver include the ability to define a passphrase the netserver must see from netperf before it will allow a test to be run. It is the global -Z option. http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/tags/netperf-2.6.0/Release_Notes happy benchmarking, rick jones