Re: [Codel] missing part of section 6.2 of draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel-02, (Kathleen Nichols)

[David Collier-Brown <davec-b@rogers.com>]

[Off-topic]
Someone with classic-typesetting-tools experience might wish to
volunteer a pandoc-based process. See, for example, 
http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/589196/0e8f212d7a59f556/

 --dave


On 03/12/2014 03:00 PM, codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net wrote:
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:32:29 -0700
> From: Kathleen Nichols <nichols@pollere.com>
> To: "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Subject: [Codel] missing part of section 6.2 of
> 	draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel-02
> Message-ID: <531F8EFD.5010807@pollere.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
>
> It has come to my attention that part of section 6.2 of the draft is
> missing, apparently due
> to passing through several programs in order to conform to the holy
> Internet Draft format.
> Since the missing part is quite interesting, here it is.
>
> When people without time to mess around with this archaic stuff stop
> doing Internet Drafts, the IETF will then only have drafts by people
> with time to mess around with this
> archaic stuff.
[snip]

-- 
David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
davecb@spamcop.net           |                      -- Mark Twain