On 03/12/2014 04:23 PM, Dave Taht wrote:


On Mar 12, 2014 1:11 PM, "David Collier-Brown" <davec-b@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> [Off-topic]
> Someone with classic-typesetting-tools experience might wish to
> volunteer a pandoc-based process. See, for example,
> http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/589196/0e8f212d7a59f556/

The fq codel rfc was written in pandoc, and converted via pandoc2rfc. The raw texts are managed in git and in github.

It took me a year of fiddling to get to acceptable output from this.

The amount of effort required was comparable to getting a paper formatted for the IEEE with TeX, with far less pleasing results than TeX.

Certainly you have to be committed if you want to write an rfc. The present process is a major barrier to entry.

>
>  --dave




AARGH!

I wasn't expecting that...

--dave





-- 
David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
davecb@spamcop.net           |                      -- Mark Twain