From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nm7-vm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm7-vm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A7C521F144 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:33:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [216.39.60.170] by nm7.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Mar 2014 21:33:00 -0000 Received: from [67.195.22.116] by tm6.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Mar 2014 21:33:00 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp111.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Mar 2014 21:33:00 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1394659980; bh=3sftRiJ0uHUFpj9muoHQSGuLI+OUTu7/huwl0KLb6V8=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type; b=Aid+FSQgwlq7g/52Wq3l0OeH24DvzSbPe5Cp8gIHYFUvlfaSLMQMyPnerRX9qD5k+xGYysnhtuO8HyiA7CpYZP9Wq4HxMAnL34d0lnE1ZNfKaanTLhFeByHwO8VGKp276dtkHogOej/WXn4DC7HcH0xBhdgzunBf5Ly32vzY0RI= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 457046.58188.bm@smtp111.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: y2jHnecVM1li85IrC6aTsSx6Y77acPZKbeFvb5PGDJxbL.a AVelFf.UJ6D2ULUnVdgG7ryQWxA7IelSCEeImeeOcS7WvzrDJqZgrGjn.4vM 3Hvx71RKNeLOVR0sn0iTqiS6cqO3dHcKv9kDVDLhlPrUvCJ5Ter.TPiid3dv w6L.5jxnwjTnAgrv.3uMOqb8DKhU05diVTIz7vhgJrwRcEN2Nifv0xtYHg2e GrZs.T1BOWWoUwVs_NYUnTyvt51r3cIP1zzdGSUuthJLZ.NCTlbeBqNo7G8U JBSXw82HMh3_uW8FHH7Bdafmig5BBeEM6DlR5KZkwfTCuZI1U0MxN0rffj1e 7sMlj5BWPEi.KrL_Suwlocz5aYBJLbuXVHYJ6BOLH4iJUkfb9XZ6h3I6_EQq 8Fyrh32eVJhmdabeTIubs5LhsIZaqz8xgSvnY7TPZZihALiIhl8AOCU4h6qa 2.fHjfqb.a6EX4x9c2koR9MmJEEuiyeEmzZpPgLGVdDiJIPFSNpv8L7QoJkx .Zf76bYbr5Y7iEoAtG8.LVb9JXi6ItFfkD86eWT1YldumdMIGAEIXec0uiP5 F3fzwkRJ4ewec5SdvgzHZgGH1VV1g9koVv22ZlMcKxiigGAQSmFadygA7FjW 8F9nMz0o1K39L9bZmJ7x1aV7epGiLw4TFtmp.AdzlGU7M X-Yahoo-SMTP: sltvjZWswBCRD.ElTuB1l9j6s9wRYPpuyTNWOE5oEg-- X-Rocket-Received: from [10.111.100.146] (davec-b@74.213.188.46 with plain [67.195.22.104]) by smtp111.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2014 21:33:00 +0000 UTC Message-ID: <5320D28A.7070100@rogers.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:32:58 -0400 From: David Collier-Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Taht , David Collier-Brown References: <5320BF5B.2090303@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010403040601080706090507" Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Codel] missing part of section 6.2 of draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel-02, (Kathleen Nichols) X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: davecb@spamcop.net List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 21:33:01 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010403040601080706090507 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/12/2014 04:23 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > > On Mar 12, 2014 1:11 PM, "David Collier-Brown" > wrote: > > > > [Off-topic] > > Someone with classic-typesetting-tools experience might wish to > > volunteer a pandoc-based process. See, for example, > > http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/589196/0e8f212d7a59f556/ > > The fq codel rfc was written in pandoc, and converted via pandoc2rfc. > The raw texts are managed in git and in github. > > It took me a year of fiddling to get to acceptable output from this. > > The amount of effort required was comparable to getting a paper > formatted for the IEEE with TeX, with far less pleasing results than TeX. > > Certainly you have to be committed if you want to write an rfc. The > present process is a major barrier to entry. > > > > > --dave > AARGH! I wasn't expecting that... --dave -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest davecb@spamcop.net | -- Mark Twain --------------010403040601080706090507 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 03/12/2014 04:23 PM, Dave Taht wrote:


On Mar 12, 2014 1:11 PM, "David Collier-Brown" <davec-b@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> [Off-topic]
> Someone with classic-typesetting-tools experience might wish to
> volunteer a pandoc-based process. See, for example,
> http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/589196/0e8f212d7a59f556/

The fq codel rfc was written in pandoc, and converted via pandoc2rfc. The raw texts are managed in git and in github.

It took me a year of fiddling to get to acceptable output from this.

The amount of effort required was comparable to getting a paper formatted for the IEEE with TeX, with far less pleasing results than TeX.

Certainly you have to be committed if you want to write an rfc. The present process is a major barrier to entry.

>
>  --dave




AARGH!

I wasn't expecting that...

--dave





-- 
David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
davecb@spamcop.net           |                      -- Mark Twain
--------------010403040601080706090507--