Re: [Codel] why RED is not considered as a solution to bufferbloat.

[Kathleen Nichols <nichols@pollere.com>]

Or even read the "boring code".

On 2/24/15 8:32 AM, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> Most of us on this list believe that to be true, in many cases after
> performing experiments ourselves, or at least looking through data
> generated by others' experiments.
> 
> However, if as I suspect you are investigating various AQM algorithms as
> part of your education, you should probably examine the data yourselves
> and come to your own conclusions. You may even get extra credit for
> being able to describe the difference between AQM and Fair Queuing, and
> how they can be combined (as in fq_codel) to give the benefits of both
> types in one go. But for that, you ARE going to need to read some boring
> papers like "RED in a different light".
> 
> - Jonathan Morton
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Codel mailing list
> Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
>