From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from homiemail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E4E21F727 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:17:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from homiemail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D16926408B; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:17:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from kmnimac.local (c-50-156-111-45.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.156.111.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nichols@pollere.net) by homiemail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAEA8264089; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:17:27 -0800 (PST) To: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: From: Kathleen Nichols Message-ID: <565E46A6.4060207@pollere.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:17:26 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Codel] what RTT was fig 7 in the codel paper? X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 01:17:51 -0000 Oh, that would have been 100 ms unloaded. On 12/1/15 10:08 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > What RTT was fig 7 in the codel paper? (the one that showed codel's > reaction to bandwidth changes?) > http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3D2209336 >=20 > I am amusing myself by trying to create an automated string of flent > tests to duplicate those results, now that flent has gained tools that > can plot queue depth as well as ping, we have a testbed with fully > controllable RTT, etc. >=20 > http://snapon.cs.kau.se/~d/nichols/basiccodel.png >=20 > "To roughly emulate a (nominal) 100-Mbps Wi-Fi link subject to > degradation, we used a load of four FTPs and five Web connections per > second and changed link rates at 50-second intervals (over the 300 > simulated seconds), first dropping to 10 Mbps, then to 1 Mbps, then > jumping to 50 Mbps, dropping to 1 Mbps, and finally jumping back to > 100 Mbps. Buffer capacity is a single BDP (830 packets) for the > nominal rate. This scenario was repeated for CoDel, Tail Drop, and > RED. " >=20 > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! > https://www.gofundme.com/savewifi > _______________________________________________ > Codel mailing list > Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel >=20