Hi Divya,
is this really the only metric that you are
interested in?
What kind of topology and traffic pattern are you
using? I would suggest to read the recent posts by Dave Taht around this topic
(perhaps looking into ns-3, as the more modern simulator, featuring RRUL test),
and also not focus too much on packet loss.
I would think, that the average and
induced latency your RED TCP sessions are expiriencing were higher than
those governed by CoDel?
What was the effective goodput, and the utilization
of your bottleneck link?
Qualitatively - I'd expect slightly sooner, and
sometimes (within an RTT - so not much problem for TCP CC) more losses with
Codel (depending where they happen) in order for it to get induced latency under
control. But quantitatively, the losses shouldn't be orders of magnitude more,
only so much to have a well running control loop there.
Best regards,
Richard
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 6:12
PM
Subject: [Codel] About Packet Drop in
Codel
Hi Members,
i am doing M.tech and my research topic is AQM.
i tried to run codel with ns-2.35.
And i found packet loss is more in codel as compared to RED.
is there anybody who also thinks the same or is it in my case only?
Am i doing something wrong?
_______________________________________________
Codel mailing
list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel