From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5095721F572 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by labbd9 with SMTP id bd9so85082793lab.2 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:56:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=NPpF/dcIf5LETr9sNTkytIdkTz58ivP81TYkV+rrcEM=; b=Iz/Rbi7l+dU8R4dYkHZChQxhnUVJ8PfmLDEb/EjJeoMqHy9UQr93RuqwcgD/uapKdC zAxQ1JGdr4LSppsny4cImYsZwBcaqpESAHgBwNePZCY5PqM7M8D/5PwmUUIOzFPyLZiY 5O7LjbFsorLiHsgB708Y3LYPOv8MUwDgHlDn4/QDOQk+eXL7PVcA0fj901ZlIXlLtQST OIBq8tC5BIC2sQhJybPJ/ck7HxU4fjT0AEV3bN/G3kx7fhwqcMux2cuJknl6DVSO20yz voTJglVxyfKzQF8nrVhqLNyTgFuF28OxxYpCMmd3rK8uEsZOKlEBxSe/Hs84WYC4P2xv r6FA== X-Received: by 10.112.202.234 with SMTP id kl10mr5018272lbc.51.1429289773572; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:56:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.25] (37-219-85-148.nat.bb.dnainternet.fi. [37.219.85.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lv10sm2518945lac.24.2015.04.17.09.56.11 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:56:06 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <661C1DD0-6DFA-4234-9695-D994934D47F1@gmail.com> References: <87sibz53kz.fsf@toke.dk> To: sahil grover X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= , "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Codel] RRUL Test X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:56:44 -0000 > On 17 Apr, 2015, at 17:52, sahil grover = wrote: >=20 > if i choose "netperf.bufferbloat.net" as a server then i think i can = proceed with one computer for bufferbloat test. > Does it make any difference? Just be aware of which equipment you=E2=80=99re effectively testing for = bufferbloat. A server based elsewhere on the Internet will mean that = the test traffic goes through your ISP and your modem, which will = probably hold the bottleneck queues for downstream and upstream = respectively. By using two of your own computers, you would instead = test an individual piece of equipment such as a router placed between = them, or the NICs of the two machines themselves. - Jonathan Morton