From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lb0-x229.google.com (mail-lb0-x229.google.com
	[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::229])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2750F21F1C7
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:04:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id y6so3485340lbh.14
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:04:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=MXMEDNlAwEebASTsIxOwIqU9Zy+bjymK98Kpg+0feiM=;
	b=RdVz18Zb3HVwog1ADdxwFVH7L2mPT7nC4Wh32tMDzuVDxmFSNGghz05TC23Z/bE6tM
	ITwLALdYlUPZ+naqPPh31Mar9csG9UIt2scT9A4knfFGfRDxrDzmDqXtU7m467QB3gRU
	MbseYtrU6aUoX0DrF7ZRLvwYZ3EYOs4ImEMq83pnKvA3sXahxpwmCLxWudxpLa+4CfBh
	Xb1fK/J5jIT3dBfBgeH97hUScqvcxehkXPO44I7ThMrWFbCHxIiuOZCjoUjhuNOVdeKz
	CeOksjdFxzFT+KjJdOh9EhsfhSOOVneUgT3TUUUPyhxzG3cqNsY4iJcNa0vdi3dlbAcy
	ynEQ==
X-Received: by 10.112.146.200 with SMTP id te8mr2281403lbb.32.1385402688758;
	Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:04:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.239.204] (87-95-22-97.bb.dnainternet.fi. [87.95.22.97])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qj3sm38833878lbb.1.2013.11.25.10.04.47
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:04:48 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F52F175DFC537F48A43937B50B44BCA27A71EA14@EXCHANGE.mediaspot.local>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:04:46 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <77EB891C-032C-4E1C-BA4B-DD44E5488CD7@gmail.com>
References: <F52F175DFC537F48A43937B50B44BCA27A71EA14@EXCHANGE.mediaspot.local>
To: Alessandro Bolletta <alessandro@mediaspot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Codel] Jumbo frames with fq_codel
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:04:51 -0000


On 25 Nov, 2013, at 8:02 pm, Alessandro Bolletta wrote:

> I'm working on an environment which runs on jumbo ethernet frames =
(about 1550bytes) and I would ask you if do you think that it's needed a =
trick in order to correctly debloat interfaces as ath9k and ag71xx which =
carries such big frames.

If it is really 1550 bytes, then that's barely bigger than a standard =
Ethernet frame of 1500 bytes.  No special adjustment could possibly be =
needed for that, beyond standard debloating techniques.

 - Jonathan Morton