Re: [Codel] [Bloat] Another passive bandwidth estimation method

[Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>]

Hi Michael,

that "teaser" you wrote is certainly interesting. Would you be able to distribute author copies to those of us that do not subscribe to IEEExplore, please?

Regards
	Sebastian


> On Aug 1, 2023, at 09:32, Michael Menth via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> we've recently developed a passive method for finding a link's capacity (in a different context). You find the algorithm in III.B.5 in
> https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9954450
> The approach ist tested in V.B for 1, 10, and 100 Gb/s links on a Linux server and provides sufficiently accurate results for bandwidth utilizations of 25%. The method is likely to work also for lower utilizations, but this was not an issue in this work. The method is applicable only by a link's head-end node. It does not work for end systems to find the bottleneck bandwidth on some unknown intermediate node. However, it can deliver useful information for scheduling algorithms in forwarding nodes, which is the use case in this paper, and which may be of interest to some readers on this list.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> Am 01.08.2023 um 00:36 schrieb Dave Taht via Bloat:
>> Promising approach:
>> 
>> https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10188775
> 
> -- 
> Prof. Dr. habil. Michael Menth
> University of Tuebingen
> Faculty of Science
> Department of Computer Science
> Chair of Communication Networks
> Sand 13, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
> phone: (+49)-7071/29-70505
> fax: (+49)-7071/29-5220
> mailto:menth@uni-tuebingen.de
> http://kn.inf.uni-tuebingen.de
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat