From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1FB2201B88 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 07:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TLb3Q-0003Ev-0v for codel@lists.bufferbloat.net; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 16:45:04 +0200 Received: from 1809ds4-ro.0.fullrate.dk ([90.184.46.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 16:45:04 +0200 Received: from toke by 1809ds4-ro.0.fullrate.dk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 16:45:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 16:31:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87d30rra1s.fsf@toke.dk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 1809ds4-ro.0.fullrate.dk User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:TAl3EolOL38kTXBmrLGQ4H3d6J0= Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Codel] better testing, linux 3.6.1, cerowrt credits, other stuff X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:45:03 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dave Taht writes: > Moving rapidly up on my own list of priorities is developing at least > a spec for better tests. Help? This is probably not what you meant, but I thought I'd use this occasion to post it anyway: I am doing a project about bufferbloat at my university (I'm a master student), which involves testing for bufferbloat and testing various qdisc's performance in a controlled environment. I've been doing my tests by running concurrent netperf instances (so far TCP_STREAM, TCP_MAERTS and TCP_RR) and collecting the results. To make this a bit easier I've written a small Python script to automate running the various netperf instances and collecting the results. I thought I'd share it here in case anyone else thinks it's useful. It's quite crude, but works slightly better than a shell script for my purposes. :) The code is available on github: https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper Oh, and in case you have any testing you'd like me to do, I'd be happy to incorporate it. I can pretty much organise the project any way I want, and it would be cool to do something that's useful for things other than satisfying my own curiosity. ;) Cheers, =2DToke =2D-=20 Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen toke@toke.dk --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQdDXIAAoJEENeEGz1+utPHqcIAI2YfaWM8cWylRzYOlCFvWmD Lx0GL5CzIA1XAxmqblfBPFDMgc2STWM9ibS9UK+yIVbuljo5DbOqVWigM6qGoxbF uX7UDsuSEup3UcULs5SdmXvRgQFxrOzXUK36SpSZfX6MH/wc6IP61MOOYIoEk+mr l356cEmVwHxcvK3mps9dZPFEIpEg7HOG2OsCx9fmoqHTmUOI7E2Z58utzbe3XTEP 0ekaEGD2zzBDtCF5q0vqKCYA8qMO3JqM8rBkWfgroOLXNO8uKn8ZRrXuyKHVOYYI Li4NDGI8YzOE2GLjI2oP7gy6uWImnB5cCl3Ir1MnnYtpAGJhanfWctfMzCwUWWc= =Dpd7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--