From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [144.76.141.112])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55BD221F1A6
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu,  5 Dec 2013 15:25:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
Sender: toke@toke.dk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1386285894; bh=H9JS/NE4dy8BElZAMmADr9tdqRQD20B2IyU86BdjE+Y=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=ToU9HoTET5tCFuXH5xHgKevwcRvJgHKTN0CAb/lxgakl6BvEuj5aVT2bDE4LPmCik
	RB+Rzazqz8VYNY54PNEusbnq7KM4u+jB4vFczcxpk1LY/1zVsaAD7jttHytoS/1ndE
	eJFoaSdYlRBOE2aSwGD2wH2JHksyuwuQ+qcC81QU=
Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 35EF1EF7F; Thu,  5 Dec 2013 23:25:43 +0000 (GMT)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Dong Mo <montedong@gmail.com>
References: <CAAUsAoTP8P4WVfYBPVjU7Ouw-Yp4dH1CuNBdM9JJ3J3P6j7k9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<D25264E7-22F7-41BF-8551-A831D3794234@gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw6JSC6xRgFHSrLZu_h82mNgCQPj8NCG6SiU2qL5zXBA4Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAUsAoS==k1=H-Wq_p5Q-bXzcjycruvmU=5njEd_mV_gCKFV=w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAUsAoQ9dRUEAXU6P90jphbTe7Xp50NrAG=_Miqy8Q400g1SGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<269B8D3A-09C7-411E-9482-27CAA898A29F@gmail.com>
	<CAAUsAoSFCk=JFUcMLOYVJ+s7ah9Hs1o1_GCgSRPkUc6u4Mvqsw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ob4vau2z.fsf@toke.dk>
	<CAAUsAoRsbZVT0K1hykYTmKo88Ljjjw9hqF4RuSqDcrp+4ihg-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 23:25:40 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAAUsAoRsbZVT0K1hykYTmKo88Ljjjw9hqF4RuSqDcrp+4ihg-A@mail.gmail.com>
	(Dong Mo's message of "Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:29:37 -0600")
Message-ID: <87fvq6c22z.fsf@toke.dk>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] New to codel-- how to run codel on a linux box?
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 23:25:41 -0000

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Dong Mo <montedong@gmail.com> writes:

> I also found this to sample tcp latency performance:
> https://code.google.com/p/paping/

Right; note that that measures time to establish a new connection, not
the delay of packets within an already established connection. My guess
would be that each established connection would have a new source port,
thus hashing into a new bin.

> Does fq_codel's flow classification supports external classifier
> filter? Say I only want to hash on dst port in my case.

I'm pretty sure it supports the normal classifier (tc filter). That
overrides the built-in hashing completely, but IIRC you can do your own
hashing in tc filter :)

-Toke

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSoQt0AAoJEENeEGz1+utPQLAH/2gGLHVeIcgqlXXa8HO4KtAE
xYAmHGIEH14mhTbk4D5PKssahoe0Xj83gqr82ZrtcX4UnpyDcLoQd8uGVGFm331T
RX6moXATBuKQrI1UkBGcGn7Lss/LXVXLlf/Vo/+xGeuAgBPFvpFNkixX6G8IC1nn
7Mn9XKtj7zeAYtZgKmlfowAm+P0LJ2hI3BapN2pdkDVSdukWOjyX0gizF99dml/v
a6VialJQ8mO8q7VgIU/yff5Yb8qAEgHu88MbQyQRaRYanvA3M1a9O5tSzprkbgZv
SQBF5piwEjPnPHLg4rEla6XRgYloX8KVIan6xTPSFw4TtPMm11jz4I8caYd0foM=
=DoZA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--