From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [144.76.141.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A429A21F18F for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:04:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Sender: toke@toke.dk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1386277383; bh=3xceaLGUahtoX8Vjq0Wy5dzRJ7SmuMS02GHcITCu+3o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Z52PTOgG3zosPnGQs0IYADLqqtls8Ol2LQIqaSyv3Q9FYDUaFO5rgh/HnMQKaGlrl +AmIqfQiZ4jKIpgcnQvtcl8BaiXS8GBbXNkBfTnZK91bOqgLMIQOsw7FDrF+Yxxkei OHFsFZRppyy4nzhar8K2uXrOaOdkxorciatyba9g= Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6387FEF44; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:03:52 +0000 (GMT) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Dong Mo References: <269B8D3A-09C7-411E-9482-27CAA898A29F@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:03:48 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Dong Mo's message of "Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:21:32 -0600") Message-ID: <87ob4vau2z.fsf@toke.dk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Codel] New to codel-- how to run codel on a linux box? X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:04:00 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Dong Mo writes: > What I am trying to do is measure the delay of packets of the same > flow experienced in A under different queuing policies (sfq or > fq_codel). > > Is there a simple way to do this? I'm currently in the early planning stages for having something like this incorporated into the netperf-wrapper [1] testing tool. In the meantime, you could look at either thrulay [2] (old and apparently abandoned, but may work in one of its variants) as a measurement tool, or tcpprobe [3] to output statistics that can (probably) tell you. -Toke [1] https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper [2] http://e2epi.internet2.edu/thrulay/ http://thrulay-hd.sourceforge.net/ http://thrulay-ng.sourceforge.net/ [3] http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/tcpprobe --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSoOo0AAoJEENeEGz1+utPHU8IAKscWbfsNXhzQJlYe+kMFmnj XSb+1zjtVXmLqLPU+6O8oSJaIV9g8Xm1nHUVSzsgM/KEQfAZZjxvnMV6XLOYGy+r gzkH3pfpsA0Cuq3AZT0gBM4fUEDsonEa+1lDGLJIL8EBRTw/w7ZRZL0SepDTn/rY TLZkwh8f/Byf0FdnfguizeTAXA5joomjqbICi3c9wt/iWwPkJmTCvCMW7N+HxhjN kWS4cmRkftuAGOVg46+4ST0DW2dth1VXtvhChKrm1hMMnfJTEnh6wUos6qg8jmYW MRcGToiaU+5YS0H65B13JvlyyubtjQlF1B4JCHVWsK3B0d/wETbLKKYGOISc2iI= =KaBa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--