Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> writes:

> Its really too basic for my needs.
>
> It decides to put the new packet at the front of transmit queue.

Right I see.

> If you use netem to add a delay, then adding reordering is only a
> matter of using a variable/randomized delay.

Yeah, realised that; was just wondering why you found the built-in
reordering mechanism insufficient. :)

-Toke